Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[UPDATED] DM's Guild No Longer Allows Creator Logos On Product Covers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve Conan Trustrum" data-source="post: 7733612" data-attributes="member: 1620"><p>"Huge" is underselling it.</p><p></p><p>"THE" factor, is more like it.</p><p></p><p>Independent DnD magazines don't exactly do well, which is what Paizo would have been doing if they were operating under the DnD brand.</p><p></p><p>When the d20 STL was still around, and there were groups where publishers got together with WotC employees and former employees to discuss it, the fact that products like Pathfinder came out was a big problem. People were creating things with the OGL and d20 STL that WotC hadn't anticipated, including creating competition for their own brands. The reason they released the OGL as royalty-free in the first place was because WotC expected the 3pp market to elevate their own sales and branding. They figured the 3pp market would be free advertising for their own products. That wasn't happening once companies used the OGL to create independent products that didn't even need the d20 STL anymore. </p><p></p><p>If you think WotC isn't concerned with the "Next Pathfinder" coming along, you've not been paying attention to the market since Pathfinder was released.</p><p></p><p>Of course WotC is concerned about Pathfinder. It took massive bites out of WotC's core market, to the point where DnD was no longer the big seller in the market it had dominated for 30 years. You don't think that's a problem they keep an eye on?</p><p></p><p>The entire DMs Guild mechanic is set up to prevent such a thing from happening. It not only requires all products be a monetization channel via royalties instead of being royalty free, but also limits how they can be presented to customers. And now it's preventing 3pp from adding their own branding to the product covers, which is the key selling visual, leaving only their own.</p><p></p><p>But you still think WotC isn't interested in controlling and limiting the 3pp market to prevent competition with their own brands?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve Conan Trustrum, post: 7733612, member: 1620"] "Huge" is underselling it. "THE" factor, is more like it. Independent DnD magazines don't exactly do well, which is what Paizo would have been doing if they were operating under the DnD brand. When the d20 STL was still around, and there were groups where publishers got together with WotC employees and former employees to discuss it, the fact that products like Pathfinder came out was a big problem. People were creating things with the OGL and d20 STL that WotC hadn't anticipated, including creating competition for their own brands. The reason they released the OGL as royalty-free in the first place was because WotC expected the 3pp market to elevate their own sales and branding. They figured the 3pp market would be free advertising for their own products. That wasn't happening once companies used the OGL to create independent products that didn't even need the d20 STL anymore. If you think WotC isn't concerned with the "Next Pathfinder" coming along, you've not been paying attention to the market since Pathfinder was released. Of course WotC is concerned about Pathfinder. It took massive bites out of WotC's core market, to the point where DnD was no longer the big seller in the market it had dominated for 30 years. You don't think that's a problem they keep an eye on? The entire DMs Guild mechanic is set up to prevent such a thing from happening. It not only requires all products be a monetization channel via royalties instead of being royalty free, but also limits how they can be presented to customers. And now it's preventing 3pp from adding their own branding to the product covers, which is the key selling visual, leaving only their own. But you still think WotC isn't interested in controlling and limiting the 3pp market to prevent competition with their own brands? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[UPDATED] DM's Guild No Longer Allows Creator Logos On Product Covers
Top