Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Upset about another edition!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheAuldGrump" data-source="post: 5811252" data-attributes="member: 6957"><p>Absolutely correct. They have no right to try to tell me that their way is better, and going by the fact that they are now killing that brand new, better than anything! game, I would have to say that a lot of folks agree with me. Especially when it is in an attempt to sell a game that has little to do with all previous editions of the game.</p><p></p><p>They could have tried building up their new game, instead they tried to denigrate a popular game, and one that, in the form of Pathfinder, continues to be more popular than they game that they tried replacing it with.</p><p></p><p>Telling people that what they are enjoying is not fun is, in point of fact, bloody <em><strong>stupid.</strong></em></p><p></p><p>Monopoly sucks, so play Monopoly 2e, just like Candyland! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>4e failed.</p><p></p><p>4e deserved to fail, as much or more because of the method that they chose for marketing as for the rules themselves.</p><p></p><p>It <em>may</em> have failed so hard that it will take the possibility of 5e succeeding with it.</p><p></p><p>The fact that 4e failed shows that it was WotC's position and choice of marketing that was untenable. </p><p></p><p>Not the fans of the previous edition.</p><p></p><p>Not the OSR.</p><p></p><p>Not the fans of 4e.</p><p></p><p>WotC, the company, is the one that took an untenable and indefensible position.</p><p></p><p>My hopes for 5e are low, but at least they are not digging themselves a ditch to stand in this time.</p><p></p><p>But whether 5e succeeds or fails, it is WotC that put themselves in a position that they started looking at a new edition two years in and started working on it three and a half years in.</p><p></p><p>Do not say that it is my position that is untenable - 4e is already waving the white flag. WotC is already asking for forgiveness.</p><p></p><p><strong>* EDIT *</strong> WotC is willing to acknowledge their mistakes, I am willing to at least look at 5e. Trying to defend them when they are admitting to error does not <em>help</em> them.</p><p></p><p>The Auld Grump</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheAuldGrump, post: 5811252, member: 6957"] Absolutely correct. They have no right to try to tell me that their way is better, and going by the fact that they are now killing that brand new, better than anything! game, I would have to say that a lot of folks agree with me. Especially when it is in an attempt to sell a game that has little to do with all previous editions of the game. They could have tried building up their new game, instead they tried to denigrate a popular game, and one that, in the form of Pathfinder, continues to be more popular than they game that they tried replacing it with. Telling people that what they are enjoying is not fun is, in point of fact, bloody [i][b]stupid.[/b][/i][b][/b] Monopoly sucks, so play Monopoly 2e, just like Candyland! :D 4e failed. 4e deserved to fail, as much or more because of the method that they chose for marketing as for the rules themselves. It [i]may[/i] have failed so hard that it will take the possibility of 5e succeeding with it. The fact that 4e failed shows that it was WotC's position and choice of marketing that was untenable. Not the fans of the previous edition. Not the OSR. Not the fans of 4e. WotC, the company, is the one that took an untenable and indefensible position. My hopes for 5e are low, but at least they are not digging themselves a ditch to stand in this time. But whether 5e succeeds or fails, it is WotC that put themselves in a position that they started looking at a new edition two years in and started working on it three and a half years in. Do not say that it is my position that is untenable - 4e is already waving the white flag. WotC is already asking for forgiveness. [b]* EDIT *[/b] WotC is willing to acknowledge their mistakes, I am willing to at least look at 5e. Trying to defend them when they are admitting to error does not [i]help[/i] them. The Auld Grump [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Upset about another edition!
Top