Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using booming blade on a reaction attack with sanctuary question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 8635040" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>I don't think this is true. The AOO happens right before they leave my "reach". They have already moved before the AOO is triggered. With a 5 feet of movement they have moved almost entirely out of their sqaure they were in and are almost entirely inside the square they moved to. If you are going to put them inside one square or the other it would be the one they are going to. It would also take almost 10 movement to move back to the center of the square they were in (almost 5 to move out, almost 5 to move back). I can see the arguement that they are still within reach when it triggers and can attack me without moving more, but not the arguement that they are in their original square.</p><p></p><p>I also think he takes the original booming blade damage because the wording of the booming blade spell is "target willingly moves <u>5 feet or more</u>". Moving 5 feet moves him to the extent of my reach. An enemy that is exactly 5 feet away is exactly at the edge of my reach (when the AOO happens) and the spell triggers at exactly that same range as well.</p><p></p><p>If the spell said "target willingly moves more than 5 feet" then he would not take the damage, but "5 feet or more" would mean he does I think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 8635040, member: 7030563"] I don't think this is true. The AOO happens right before they leave my "reach". They have already moved before the AOO is triggered. With a 5 feet of movement they have moved almost entirely out of their sqaure they were in and are almost entirely inside the square they moved to. If you are going to put them inside one square or the other it would be the one they are going to. It would also take almost 10 movement to move back to the center of the square they were in (almost 5 to move out, almost 5 to move back). I can see the arguement that they are still within reach when it triggers and can attack me without moving more, but not the arguement that they are in their original square. I also think he takes the original booming blade damage because the wording of the booming blade spell is "target willingly moves [U]5 feet or more[/U]". Moving 5 feet moves him to the extent of my reach. An enemy that is exactly 5 feet away is exactly at the edge of my reach (when the AOO happens) and the spell triggers at exactly that same range as well. If the spell said "target willingly moves more than 5 feet" then he would not take the damage, but "5 feet or more" would mean he does I think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Using booming blade on a reaction attack with sanctuary question
Top