Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DammitVictor" data-source="post: 9200477" data-attributes="member: 6750908">[USER=1]@Morrus[/USER] (sorry for doing it twice, won't do it a third)This... is how I use ChatGPT for my psychobilly D&D mashups.Okay. Ground rules. Let's poke around with converting sci-fi aliens to the Spelljammer setting, and moving back and forth between editions.Okay, so... I do this a lot and I'm familiar with some of the weak spots. ChatGPT's knowledge of Alternity goes... a little bit past the core rulebooks, but not into the later setting supplements. It clearly doesn't have a clue what a thaal or an oortling is, and it punted every aspect of this question pertaining to them. Schade.Okay, so... wrong. But only wrong on Size. Correct this, and it regurgitates the whole response unprompted:Notice that with the change in size, it changed the ability score adjustments and removed the additional penalty to Strength-based skills. And... the reference to "disadvantage" and "Strength-based skills" in AD&D.Ask it about class and level restrictions:Legit. By default, every AD&D race gets Fighter and Cleric, but fraal have compelling reasons not to.Asked about multiclassing:So... they can be Mage/Thief or maybe Psionicist/Thief, but not single-classed Thief. May not have been what ChatGPT was trying to say... but it works, and can be modified by a human brain that knows it owns books.It forgot the Favored Class.ChatGPT is a little fuzzy on the difference between 3.X's favored class rules and Pathfinder's.I did not expect it to get the correct class levels for each ability.I don't know. Looks close to me, but I'm not as familiar with PF2.Well. That just didn't work at all.</blockquote>

Verification