Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WizO_Adele" data-source="post: 2565064">Nevine, in your example if Juxta were chosen to merge into Greyhawk, and the Setting Restricted Greyhawk proposal were chosen we would need to run a third and final poll, to determine if the merged areas would also apply the Setting Restricted proposal.In other words, it's possible to have two fantasy areas set in greyhawk, where a tavern themed area has a stricter enforcement level than the marketplace themed area. They'd be in the same setting, but have different enforcement levels. Dontella is the only one to convey her intention in her something else entirely vote. Others should as well. I should be able to edit the poll to add additional choices... I hadn't thought much about that yet... Anyway, to address Dontella's selection straightforward:If the request is to hold one large vote and the two most popular choices become the two new settings, I think that would be rather messy, because conflicting settings would exist in the same poll. In other words the two Greyhawk proposals could in theory win, which would be really hard to implement. They need to remain two separate polls, each identified and associated with a current setting area. If the request is to hold one large vote and the result be one entire new setting, and just one setting, I'm not keen on that either. We need two settings (four main rooms). If in the future, we want to pursue eliminating a setting completely and dropping down to one setting (two rooms) we can discuss that. However, it's not on the table right now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WizO_Adele, post: 2565064"] Nevine, in your example if Juxta were chosen to merge into Greyhawk, and the Setting Restricted Greyhawk proposal were chosen we would need to run a third and final poll, to determine if the merged areas would also apply the Setting Restricted proposal. In other words, it's possible to have two fantasy areas set in greyhawk, where a tavern themed area has a stricter enforcement level than the marketplace themed area. They'd be in the same setting, but have different enforcement levels. Dontella is the only one to convey her intention in her something else entirely vote. Others should as well. I should be able to edit the poll to add additional choices... I hadn't thought much about that yet... Anyway, to address Dontella's selection straightforward: If the request is to hold one large vote and the two most popular choices become the two new settings, I think that would be rather messy, because conflicting settings would exist in the same poll. In other words the two Greyhawk proposals could in theory win, which would be really hard to implement. [B]They need to remain two separate polls, each identified and associated with a current setting area. [/B] If the request is to hold one large vote and the result be one entire new setting, and just one setting, I'm not keen on that either. We need two settings (four main rooms). If in the future, we want to pursue eliminating a setting completely and dropping down to one setting (two rooms) we can discuss that. However, it's not on the table right now. [/QUOTE]

Verification