Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DMZ2112" data-source="post: 6247838" data-attributes="member: 78752">Why do these threads always devolve into a discussion of the validity of internet polls?&nbsp; BORING.It looks to me like the D&amp;D5 devs are leaning in exactly <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?350131-Wandering-Monsters-Worlds-of-D-amp-D&amp;p=6242301&amp;viewfull=1#post6242301" target="_blank">the direction</a> I proposed in the previous thread on this topic, so I don't have much to add except, &quot;Yay!&quot;That said, in response to some of the other topics in this thread: - D&amp;D never had a &quot;default setting&quot; until the launch of D&amp;D3, so the idea that core books contained setting-specific information prior to the year 2000 is bollocks,- I think there's benefit to the idea of a D&amp;D core cosmology /and/ to the idea of a D&amp;D cosmology construction kit, but not in the same book.&nbsp; It's two books, and they ought to commit to that upfront.&nbsp; Combining them will just mean a shoddy cosmology and a shoddy kit.- Kamikaze Midget, how can one man be so wrong, all the time?&nbsp; Why don't you collapse into some kind of supermassive singularity of incorrectness?&nbsp; I am haunted by your continued noncollapsiness.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DMZ2112, post: 6247838, member: 78752"] Why do these threads always devolve into a discussion of the validity of internet polls? BORING. It looks to me like the D&D5 devs are leaning in exactly [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?350131-Wandering-Monsters-Worlds-of-D-amp-D&p=6242301&viewfull=1#post6242301"]the direction[/URL] I proposed in the previous thread on this topic, so I don't have much to add except, "Yay!" That said, in response to some of the other topics in this thread: - D&D never had a "default setting" until the launch of D&D3, so the idea that core books contained setting-specific information prior to the year 2000 is bollocks, - I think there's benefit to the idea of a D&D core cosmology /and/ to the idea of a D&D cosmology construction kit, but not in the same book. It's two books, and they ought to commit to that upfront. Combining them will just mean a shoddy cosmology and a shoddy kit. - Kamikaze Midget, how can one man be so wrong, all the time? Why don't you collapse into some kind of supermassive singularity of incorrectness? I am haunted by your continued noncollapsiness. [/QUOTE]

Verification