Fanaelialae
Legend
Sorry if confusion.
I was talking about the ruling against spells with more than one potential target.
As Hemlock pointed out, the only ruling AFAIK is the ruling against Twin Spell. Which makes sense because Twin spell requires a second target for a spell that has one target, but Warcaster restricts you to only targeting the creature that provoked the OA. Warcaster and Twin Spell requirements are different. If you're aware of a different ruling, I'd be interested in reading it.
Specifically, my reply was aimed towards those saying "not allowing EB for no good reason is stupid".
There IS a reason. Feel free to houserule otherwise, but not because the reason isn't valid.
I just did a quick reread of the thread, and I didn't see anyone saying, "not allowing EB for no good reason is stupid".
That said, I did show above that even with the agonizing invocation, it's comparable to a bladelock using booming blade. Technically, using EB is significantly worse than BB since without Crossbow Expert all of the EB attacks are made with disadvantage. Of course, as I said before, if you don't allow BB then that changes the equation and you might not want to allow EB to work in conjunction with Warcaster. However, there's no strong balance reason to do so if a better option (BB) exists in the campaign.
Last edited: