Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Was I in the wrong?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 6827131" data-attributes="member: 45197"><p>Hiya!</p><p></p><p>*shrug*</p><p></p><p>I think the DM is in the right. Gauntlets (metal) are part of a 'suit of armor'. So, saying "I sell the armor" would naturally include the gauntlets...as it would a helmet. Seeing as the ring was specifically mentioned as being part of the gauntlets, and not easily removable, the PC <em>would</em> have understood that selling them would mean the ring goes with it. Adding all that together gives "<em>I sell the armor" equivalence to "I sell the armor (including the helm, gauntlets, ring, greeves, and everything else that is a part of this suit of armor</em>".</p><p></p><p>As a DM if I feel the players are glossing over something that should probably at least make their characters pause...I will 'mention' it in passing. If they still keep with what they stated, so be it. My hands are clean.</p><p></p><p>In the OP's situation, I would have likely said something like:</p><p></p><p><em>"The blacksmith is eager to buy. He spaces out the stuff on the table, placing the helm to the left, then the core armor, then the miss-matched gauntlets. He looks at you and asks, 'Do we have a deal then?'".</em></p><p></p><p>So, I would specifically mention the helm (not even mentioned in the original description of the armor), the core armor, the gauntlets. If the player agrees to the deal...so be it. He had his chance. His character was looking right there at everything separately. His character obviously didn't feel the gauntlets and ring were important enough to be separate. Player mistake...not the DM. But that's how I've learned to DM over the decades. Live and learn I guess. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Now, for the OP's problem... he should use this as an opportunity to lay down a house rule or "ground work" for future situations. He should go back and say "OK, the gauntlets with the embedded ring wasn't part of the deal. I can see your point. However, from now on, if you guys don't specifically say something about something unusual, I will assume you are treating that 'unusual thing' as inconsequential. So if you find a 'long sword that has a scabbard that is made from solid brass and red-leather', and you decide to sell that sword...the scabbard is going with it unless you make mention of it". This way, future "player distractions at the table" are on them.</p><p></p><p>^_^</p><p></p><p>Paul L. Ming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pming, post: 6827131, member: 45197"] Hiya! *shrug* I think the DM is in the right. Gauntlets (metal) are part of a 'suit of armor'. So, saying "I sell the armor" would naturally include the gauntlets...as it would a helmet. Seeing as the ring was specifically mentioned as being part of the gauntlets, and not easily removable, the PC [I]would[/I] have understood that selling them would mean the ring goes with it. Adding all that together gives "[I]I sell the armor" equivalence to "I sell the armor (including the helm, gauntlets, ring, greeves, and everything else that is a part of this suit of armor[/I]". As a DM if I feel the players are glossing over something that should probably at least make their characters pause...I will 'mention' it in passing. If they still keep with what they stated, so be it. My hands are clean. In the OP's situation, I would have likely said something like: [I]"The blacksmith is eager to buy. He spaces out the stuff on the table, placing the helm to the left, then the core armor, then the miss-matched gauntlets. He looks at you and asks, 'Do we have a deal then?'".[/I] So, I would specifically mention the helm (not even mentioned in the original description of the armor), the core armor, the gauntlets. If the player agrees to the deal...so be it. He had his chance. His character was looking right there at everything separately. His character obviously didn't feel the gauntlets and ring were important enough to be separate. Player mistake...not the DM. But that's how I've learned to DM over the decades. Live and learn I guess. :) Now, for the OP's problem... he should use this as an opportunity to lay down a house rule or "ground work" for future situations. He should go back and say "OK, the gauntlets with the embedded ring wasn't part of the deal. I can see your point. However, from now on, if you guys don't specifically say something about something unusual, I will assume you are treating that 'unusual thing' as inconsequential. So if you find a 'long sword that has a scabbard that is made from solid brass and red-leather', and you decide to sell that sword...the scabbard is going with it unless you make mention of it". This way, future "player distractions at the table" are on them. ^_^ Paul L. Ming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Was I in the wrong?
Top