Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Was I in the wrong?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aura" data-source="post: 6828258" data-attributes="member: 6747658"><p>I can see how a DM might make the mistake of not giving a fair chance for the PC to notice the ring/gauntlets. I have yet to see how purposely omitting the fair chance makes for good DMing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First (and not in the order you presented):</p><p>(1) Nobody should call the DM names, other posters names, etc, etc. Agreed.</p><p>(2) I haven't been able to read intently enough to tell who things the chance should have been automatic vs who thinks it should have been a chance. (Although I suspect the 'automatic' crowd is small.) Further, I do not support making the chance automatic to simply keep the players from making a mistake. However....</p><p>(3) The chance may rise to automatic depending on player action. Based on the first description, I would not have ventured this thought. However, in the updated description, when we find out the seller was attempting to assess the value of the armor, this implies an increased chance, perhaps to automatic.</p><p></p><p>So, 'automatic' might even be an appropriate DM arbitration--so long as it's not to simply prevent the players from making a mistake.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aura, post: 6828258, member: 6747658"] I can see how a DM might make the mistake of not giving a fair chance for the PC to notice the ring/gauntlets. I have yet to see how purposely omitting the fair chance makes for good DMing. First (and not in the order you presented): (1) Nobody should call the DM names, other posters names, etc, etc. Agreed. (2) I haven't been able to read intently enough to tell who things the chance should have been automatic vs who thinks it should have been a chance. (Although I suspect the 'automatic' crowd is small.) Further, I do not support making the chance automatic to simply keep the players from making a mistake. However.... (3) The chance may rise to automatic depending on player action. Based on the first description, I would not have ventured this thought. However, in the updated description, when we find out the seller was attempting to assess the value of the armor, this implies an increased chance, perhaps to automatic. So, 'automatic' might even be an appropriate DM arbitration--so long as it's not to simply prevent the players from making a mistake. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Was I in the wrong?
Top