Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 6844512" data-attributes="member: 6701872">That is absolutely false, I made no such assumption. Yeah, you do, but that's fine - it happens. I won't hold it against you.I didn't say that you did. I asked you what you were talking about because you saying &quot;there is no reason to assume that&quot; (emphasis mine) when there is no that which I have assumed is confusing (like most non sequitur statements).If you are saying that there is no reason for me to assume that possibility actually occurred, that is correct, and being correct is precisely why I didn't make that assumption.If you are saying that there is no reason for me to assume there is such a possibility, then that is also correct - but only because I am not assuming it is possible, I know from evidence that it is possible. I have experienced far more people, of all ages, willing to say something besides the full truth in front of who they think might not like to hear it and will reveal the full truth &quot;behind their back&quot;, to borrow a phrase, than I have people that are like me and willing to share nothing but the full truth even if it might not be pleasant to hear.&nbsp; Not in argument.Again, you are mistaken that I am &quot;going with anything else.&quot; What I am doing is saying that what the DM has told us is almost certainly what he was told by his players, but without testimony directly from those players without the DM seeing/hearing said testimony we cannot know with any certainty whether what they told their DM was the full truth or not (and I'm not assuming either of those outcomes).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AaronOfBarbaria, post: 6844512, member: 6701872"] That is absolutely false, I made no such assumption. Yeah, you do, but that's fine - it happens. I won't hold it against you. I didn't say that you did. I asked you what you were talking about because you saying "there is no reason to assume [I]that[/I]" (emphasis mine) when there is no [I]that[/I] which I have assumed is confusing (like most non sequitur statements). If you are saying that there is no reason for me to assume that possibility actually occurred, that is correct, and being correct is precisely why I didn't make that assumption. If you are saying that there is no reason for me to assume there is such a possibility, then that is also correct - but only because I am not [I]assuming[/I] it is possible, I [I]know from evidence[/I] that it is possible. I have experienced far more people, of all ages, willing to say something besides the full truth in front of who they think might not like to hear it and will reveal the full truth "behind their back", to borrow a phrase, than I have people that are like me and willing to share nothing but the full truth even if it might not be pleasant to hear. Not in argument. Again, you are mistaken that I am "going with anything else." What I am doing is saying that what the DM has told us is almost certainly what he was told by his players, but without testimony directly from those players without the DM seeing/hearing said testimony we cannot know with any certainty whether what they told their DM was the full truth or not (and I'm not assuming either of those outcomes). [/QUOTE]

Verification