Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Was I in the wrong?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ilbranteloth" data-source="post: 6851340" data-attributes="member: 6778044"><p>Because the items in question were bundled together by rope. The bundle was in plain view. It is never stated anywhere that the bundle is untied. Not by the barbarian, not by the ranger, nor by the smith.</p><p></p><p>Some items would be concealed at the very least, if not entirely hidden with the bundle. Various pieces of armor could easily have a rope strung through them to keep them together. Others, like gauntlets, can not be easily strung up like that. A logical option would be to stuff them inside the main part of the armor (the breast/chest plates) or the helm. Somebody examining said bundle could be just moving things around a bit to see if everything, or at least most things, are there. At any given point in time half of the bundle is hidden because it's on the other side of the bundle. This would be similar to looking into a sack and looking underneath the things inside. The viewer turns things toward themselves for an optimal view. Which generally means that somebody directly opposite you will have a sub-optimal view, if not the worst possible view.</p><p></p><p>Since the smith is on the opposite side of the counter from the ranger, it follows that the smith can see what's on the opposite side of the bundle from what the ranger can see. As such, it's entirely logical that if he's looking into the suit of armor, where the gauntlets might logically be stored, that he would "notice the ring" as stated by the DM, and then stop examining the bundle so the ranger won't see the ring.</p><p></p><p>Again, the ranger had no idea that the gauntlets or the ring even existed, or at least the player didn't. I contend that both didn't. That being the case, I don't expect he was closely watching him examine the armor. I do think that some skill checks would have been appropriate, but I don't think that the ranger seeing the gauntlets would automatically mean that he'd question them being there. Why would he? He had no idea they were different.</p><p></p><p>Ilbranteloth</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ilbranteloth, post: 6851340, member: 6778044"] Because the items in question were bundled together by rope. The bundle was in plain view. It is never stated anywhere that the bundle is untied. Not by the barbarian, not by the ranger, nor by the smith. Some items would be concealed at the very least, if not entirely hidden with the bundle. Various pieces of armor could easily have a rope strung through them to keep them together. Others, like gauntlets, can not be easily strung up like that. A logical option would be to stuff them inside the main part of the armor (the breast/chest plates) or the helm. Somebody examining said bundle could be just moving things around a bit to see if everything, or at least most things, are there. At any given point in time half of the bundle is hidden because it's on the other side of the bundle. This would be similar to looking into a sack and looking underneath the things inside. The viewer turns things toward themselves for an optimal view. Which generally means that somebody directly opposite you will have a sub-optimal view, if not the worst possible view. Since the smith is on the opposite side of the counter from the ranger, it follows that the smith can see what's on the opposite side of the bundle from what the ranger can see. As such, it's entirely logical that if he's looking into the suit of armor, where the gauntlets might logically be stored, that he would "notice the ring" as stated by the DM, and then stop examining the bundle so the ranger won't see the ring. Again, the ranger had no idea that the gauntlets or the ring even existed, or at least the player didn't. I contend that both didn't. That being the case, I don't expect he was closely watching him examine the armor. I do think that some skill checks would have been appropriate, but I don't think that the ranger seeing the gauntlets would automatically mean that he'd question them being there. Why would he? He had no idea they were different. Ilbranteloth [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Was I in the wrong?
Top