Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6853547" data-attributes="member: 42582">My own view is that, given the OP's posts, and extrapolating to my experience with various GMs over the years, I think it is quite likely that the GM didn't think of the details of what the purchaser NPC was doing, nor of what the ranger PC could or could not see.This is one of the factors that makes me characterise the GM as having done a relatively poor job.Given the state of the ranger player's knowledge, I don't think there is much that he could have done unless the other players had intervened.But it seems to me that they didn't intervene, perhaps in part because it didn't occur to them that &quot;selling the whole set&quot; would mean selling the gaunlets and ring. It's not clear who was at the table, whether one of the other players said &quot;Make sure you separate out the gauntlets and ring&quot; and the ranger player ignored this, etc.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6853547, member: 42582"] My own view is that, given the OP's posts, and extrapolating to my experience with various GMs over the years, I think it is quite likely that the GM didn't think of the details of what the purchaser NPC was doing, nor of what the ranger PC could or could not see. This is one of the factors that makes me characterise the GM as having done a relatively poor job. Given the state of the ranger player's knowledge, I don't think there is much that he could have done unless the other players had intervened. But it seems to me that they didn't intervene, perhaps in part because it didn't occur to them that "selling the whole set" would mean selling the gaunlets and ring. It's not clear who was at the table, whether one of the other players said "Make sure you separate out the gauntlets and ring" and the ranger player ignored this, etc. [/QUOTE]

Verification