Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Weird idea on attribute costs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deleteme123456" data-source="post: 4417639" data-attributes="member: 65832"><p>So to see if I get this right, your DBorn Pally (original) has</p><p>18/12/10/11/13/16</p><p></p><p>You Eladrin Pally (modified) has</p><p>18/13/12/12/13/15</p><p></p><p>I would do this:</p><p>10/10/10/8/10/10 (who needs INT) -> 10/10/12/10/10/10</p><p></p><p>STR -> 18 (cost 16, remain 12) [fixed in edit]</p><p>CON -> 12 (cost 2, remain 10)</p><p>DEX -> 12</p><p>INT -> 10</p><p>WIS -> 14 (cost 5, remain 5)</p><p>CHA -> 14 (cost 5, remain 0)</p><p></p><p>I now have </p><p>18/12/12/10/14/14, which I think I would argue is better than your DBorn std array, but let's point buy the DBorn instead of standard array and see...</p><p></p><p>18/13/10/8/14/16 is a pretty good typical DBorn str-based Pally array</p><p></p><p>Old point buy can actually make the exact same array for the D-born Pally as the modified Eladrin Pally, so that certainly seems balanced; depending on your meaning of balance.</p><p></p><p>Again for comparison, the modified DBorn Pally was:</p><p>18/12/10/11/13/16</p><p></p><p>I would do this as</p><p>10/10/10/8/10/10 -> 12/10/10/8/10/12. </p><p>Str to 18 (14, 14 remain)</p><p>Con to 12 (2, 12 remain) [fixed in 2nd edit]</p><p>Dex leave (12 remain)</p><p>Int leave (12 remain)</p><p>Wis to 14 (5, 7 remain)</p><p>Cha to 16 (7, 0 remain)</p><p>= 18/12/10/8/14/16. </p><p></p><p>Now if you compare to the standard point-buy, you'll find that the modified build has only 13 wis where the other had 14. </p><p></p><p>So it seems like this really hurts when you're trying to use both your modifiers, and helps a lot when you aren't using either. Another case worth looking at would be say, a Genasi Pally with STR/INT.</p><p>10/10/10/8/10/10 -> 12/10/10/10/10/10</p><p>STR to 18 (14/14) [fixed in 2nd edit]</p><p>CON to 12 (2/12)</p><p>DEX -</p><p>INT -</p><p>WIS to 14 (5/7)</p><p>CHA to 14 (5/2)</p><p></p><p>With 2 leftover points, it's hard to say what's worth doing. Wis 15 or Cha 15 are choices, Con 13 and Dex 11 (gets +1 initiative at Paragon, OK, not a very compelling argument...). Probably just put it in Wis or Cha.</p><p></p><p>All under modified: [fixed in various edits]</p><p>G: 18/12/10/10/14/15</p><p>E: 18/12/12/10/14/14</p><p>D: 18/12/10/8/14/16</p><p></p><p>Original pointbuy:</p><p>D: 18/13/10/8/14/16</p><p></p><p>OK, so it does look like there is still a very slight advantage to having 2 +2s vs none or one, and only a very very tiny advantage to having a single +2 over none, as the Genosi can't really capitalize on the extra STR. What about 16/16/16 builds, instead of 18/16/14 builds... these are doable in the original point buy... will make another post so this one doesn't get even more confusing. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deleteme123456, post: 4417639, member: 65832"] So to see if I get this right, your DBorn Pally (original) has 18/12/10/11/13/16 You Eladrin Pally (modified) has 18/13/12/12/13/15 I would do this: 10/10/10/8/10/10 (who needs INT) -> 10/10/12/10/10/10 STR -> 18 (cost 16, remain 12) [fixed in edit] CON -> 12 (cost 2, remain 10) DEX -> 12 INT -> 10 WIS -> 14 (cost 5, remain 5) CHA -> 14 (cost 5, remain 0) I now have 18/12/12/10/14/14, which I think I would argue is better than your DBorn std array, but let's point buy the DBorn instead of standard array and see... 18/13/10/8/14/16 is a pretty good typical DBorn str-based Pally array Old point buy can actually make the exact same array for the D-born Pally as the modified Eladrin Pally, so that certainly seems balanced; depending on your meaning of balance. Again for comparison, the modified DBorn Pally was: 18/12/10/11/13/16 I would do this as 10/10/10/8/10/10 -> 12/10/10/8/10/12. Str to 18 (14, 14 remain) Con to 12 (2, 12 remain) [fixed in 2nd edit] Dex leave (12 remain) Int leave (12 remain) Wis to 14 (5, 7 remain) Cha to 16 (7, 0 remain) = 18/12/10/8/14/16. Now if you compare to the standard point-buy, you'll find that the modified build has only 13 wis where the other had 14. So it seems like this really hurts when you're trying to use both your modifiers, and helps a lot when you aren't using either. Another case worth looking at would be say, a Genasi Pally with STR/INT. 10/10/10/8/10/10 -> 12/10/10/10/10/10 STR to 18 (14/14) [fixed in 2nd edit] CON to 12 (2/12) DEX - INT - WIS to 14 (5/7) CHA to 14 (5/2) With 2 leftover points, it's hard to say what's worth doing. Wis 15 or Cha 15 are choices, Con 13 and Dex 11 (gets +1 initiative at Paragon, OK, not a very compelling argument...). Probably just put it in Wis or Cha. All under modified: [fixed in various edits] G: 18/12/10/10/14/15 E: 18/12/12/10/14/14 D: 18/12/10/8/14/16 Original pointbuy: D: 18/13/10/8/14/16 OK, so it does look like there is still a very slight advantage to having 2 +2s vs none or one, and only a very very tiny advantage to having a single +2 over none, as the Genosi can't really capitalize on the extra STR. What about 16/16/16 builds, instead of 18/16/14 builds... these are doable in the original point buy... will make another post so this one doesn't get even more confusing. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Weird idea on attribute costs
Top