Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Were PrC's done all wrong?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TiQuinn" data-source="post: 244108" data-attributes="member: 4871"><p><strong>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: PrCs</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>IIRC, you can take the Arcane Preparation feat as a Sorcerer. But there again, it'd still be something I'd want to tweak.</p><p></p><p>My main point about PrCs is I think they should be balanced against other classes so that there is a distinct choice being made: You give up something in order to gain some other ability. This just doesn't exist in a lot of the PrCs in the classbooks.</p><p></p><p>They should also be fairly open. They can be geared towards one type of class but they shouldn't be exclusive to one class. An Order of the Bow Initiate, for example, could get there whether he was primarily a fighter, or a rogue, or a ranger. Fighter may be more easier and will meet the reqs first, but it's still open to other classes.</p><p></p><p>Third, I just think anything put out by WotC should be playtested. I'm sure they would say that they have been, but I have my doubts. Honestly, I hold them to a higher standard because they created the system. If you take a PrC out of some other source, then you may be taking your chances. It may be great, but it may be horrible too. I just don't think the same should apply to WotC, particularly when they did such a great job with the core rulebooks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TiQuinn, post: 244108, member: 4871"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: PrCs[/b] IIRC, you can take the Arcane Preparation feat as a Sorcerer. But there again, it'd still be something I'd want to tweak. My main point about PrCs is I think they should be balanced against other classes so that there is a distinct choice being made: You give up something in order to gain some other ability. This just doesn't exist in a lot of the PrCs in the classbooks. They should also be fairly open. They can be geared towards one type of class but they shouldn't be exclusive to one class. An Order of the Bow Initiate, for example, could get there whether he was primarily a fighter, or a rogue, or a ranger. Fighter may be more easier and will meet the reqs first, but it's still open to other classes. Third, I just think anything put out by WotC should be playtested. I'm sure they would say that they have been, but I have my doubts. Honestly, I hold them to a higher standard because they created the system. If you take a PrC out of some other source, then you may be taking your chances. It may be great, but it may be horrible too. I just don't think the same should apply to WotC, particularly when they did such a great job with the core rulebooks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Were PrC's done all wrong?
Top