Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Were PrC's done all wrong?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Corinth" data-source="post: 244138" data-attributes="member: 497"><p><strong>Re: Re: Re: Re: PrCs</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>This isn't the problem that you think it is because it requires the player to manage another resource--his Spellpool debt--along with all of the other ones. Use of the Spellpool takes a full-round action, and it is dependant upon an item that is easy to filch off of the magician's person. These are hardly trivial concerns, and the wise DM will be mindful of them when his game includes a PC of this class.</p><p></p><p>There are no required training times for PCs in D&D by default. If they exist, then they do so at the DM's will and no other; take it up with him. Otherwise, time is entirely the province of the DM and he can allow PCs as much or as little as he desires. A wise DM with a well-built world will have outside events occuring that impact upon the PCs, independant of metagame concerns, and those may disallow PCs from taking all of the time that they wish in their downtime pursuits. A DM may also want to keep things on a short leash for other reasons. Regardless, time is soley the DM's to do with as he will; if he allows a PC to rack up weeks or years of credit in the Spellpool, then that's his problem and no one else is to blame.</p><p></p><p>S&F, page 33: "Once per round, whenever an ally within line of sight gains an attack of opportunity upon a foe, the initiate can make one ranged attack against the same foe, at his highest attack bonus as a free action."</p><p></p><p>This means nothing more than the OotB PC gets an extra AoO w/ his bow.</p><p></p><p>Bringing up the Arcane Archer and Deepwoods Sniper is quite fair because they are viable alternatives to the Order of the Bow Initiate; it's a valid answer to your question, and you do not get to bitch about it after the fact. The rules also allow multiple PrCs, so your preferences mean nothing outside any game that you run.</p><p>You don't have to like it, but that's the way it is.</p><p></p><p>Read closer next time, and read for comprehension. You seem to miss things that are obvious to others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Corinth, post: 244138, member: 497"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re: PrCs[/b] This isn't the problem that you think it is because it requires the player to manage another resource--his Spellpool debt--along with all of the other ones. Use of the Spellpool takes a full-round action, and it is dependant upon an item that is easy to filch off of the magician's person. These are hardly trivial concerns, and the wise DM will be mindful of them when his game includes a PC of this class. There are no required training times for PCs in D&D by default. If they exist, then they do so at the DM's will and no other; take it up with him. Otherwise, time is entirely the province of the DM and he can allow PCs as much or as little as he desires. A wise DM with a well-built world will have outside events occuring that impact upon the PCs, independant of metagame concerns, and those may disallow PCs from taking all of the time that they wish in their downtime pursuits. A DM may also want to keep things on a short leash for other reasons. Regardless, time is soley the DM's to do with as he will; if he allows a PC to rack up weeks or years of credit in the Spellpool, then that's his problem and no one else is to blame. S&F, page 33: "Once per round, whenever an ally within line of sight gains an attack of opportunity upon a foe, the initiate can make one ranged attack against the same foe, at his highest attack bonus as a free action." This means nothing more than the OotB PC gets an extra AoO w/ his bow. Bringing up the Arcane Archer and Deepwoods Sniper is quite fair because they are viable alternatives to the Order of the Bow Initiate; it's a valid answer to your question, and you do not get to bitch about it after the fact. The rules also allow multiple PrCs, so your preferences mean nothing outside any game that you run. You don't have to like it, but that's the way it is. Read closer next time, and read for comprehension. You seem to miss things that are obvious to others. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Were PrC's done all wrong?
Top