Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What are the "True Issues" with 5e?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 9116299" data-attributes="member: 6801845"><p>I guess I just don't think of these things as true issues, it's more a preference. I don't care how people declare actions any more than I care how they declare an attack or spell in combat encounters. At a certain point it's just a short hand and as long as people are being clear, I don't care. If someone is being vague, intentionally or not, I'll ask for details. In all my years of DMing I've never seen significant issues with this.</p><p></p><p>Why shouldn't "I roll stealth" ever be said? It's far more likely that someone will say "I try to sneak past", but I don't read the PHB or DMG as a holy text or even as a "This is the way the game <em>must</em> be played". That, to me is far too strict a wording. Each group should find the style and flow that works for them. So at my table if it's clear the group is trying to sneak past someone a "Stealth X" is good enough.</p><p></p><p>As far as insight, I'll give generalities, it's not a straight up lie detector. It's <em>not</em> "Is he lying", or at least not <em>just</em> lying. You're paying close attention so you might notice that they're nervous or stumble over the name of the guard captain. I don't want to play the equivalent of "guess the emotional state and ask specifically for that emotional state" game.</p><p></p><p>End of the day we are playing a game and I want people to feel declare actions in any way that works for them. Simply replacing one style of people declaring what they are doing does not improve the quality of the game in my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 9116299, member: 6801845"] I guess I just don't think of these things as true issues, it's more a preference. I don't care how people declare actions any more than I care how they declare an attack or spell in combat encounters. At a certain point it's just a short hand and as long as people are being clear, I don't care. If someone is being vague, intentionally or not, I'll ask for details. In all my years of DMing I've never seen significant issues with this. Why shouldn't "I roll stealth" ever be said? It's far more likely that someone will say "I try to sneak past", but I don't read the PHB or DMG as a holy text or even as a "This is the way the game [I]must[/I] be played". That, to me is far too strict a wording. Each group should find the style and flow that works for them. So at my table if it's clear the group is trying to sneak past someone a "Stealth X" is good enough. As far as insight, I'll give generalities, it's not a straight up lie detector. It's [I]not[/I] "Is he lying", or at least not [I]just[/I] lying. You're paying close attention so you might notice that they're nervous or stumble over the name of the guard captain. I don't want to play the equivalent of "guess the emotional state and ask specifically for that emotional state" game. End of the day we are playing a game and I want people to feel declare actions in any way that works for them. Simply replacing one style of people declaring what they are doing does not improve the quality of the game in my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What are the "True Issues" with 5e?
Top