Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 9119072" data-attributes="member: 59816">No one that I know of is trying to make it into a fight.I only stepped in because it seemed to me that you were spending an inordinate amount of effort to explain that their method was harder, in spite of them telling you that they felt that it wasn't. You really DID spend three or four posts (SEEMINGLY) telling them they were wrong for doing it the way that they do. I would think that a better method of achieving your philosophical discussion would be to at least acknowledge that their way has the merits that it does, even if you yourself would find it more difficult to do that way.At any rate, my point was absolutely NOT to get into an argument with you about it - it was the opposite of that (an attempt to end one). So I have failed terribly at what I set out to do. Therefore, I will leave it alone. I'm sorry I spoke up at all now, in fact. And I honestly can't believe that I've somehow managed to be seen as part of an &quot;obnoxiously D&amp;D thing&quot;. That's not remotely how I intend to come across. I assume, by your shaking your head about it, that you don't intend to be part of that problem either, and yet, I only spoke up because you appeared to me to be doing exactly that sort of thing. So I think that we've fallen into a trap. Let's make peace instead.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FitzTheRuke, post: 9119072, member: 59816"] No one that I know of is trying to make it into a fight. I only stepped in because it seemed to me that you were spending an inordinate amount of effort to explain that their method was harder, in spite of them telling you that they felt that it wasn't. You really DID spend three or four posts (SEEMINGLY) telling them they were wrong for doing it the way that they do. I would think that a better method of achieving your philosophical discussion would be to at least acknowledge that their way has the merits that it does, even if you yourself would find it more difficult to do that way. At any rate, my point was absolutely NOT to get into an argument with you about it - it was the opposite of that (an attempt to end one). So I have failed terribly at what I set out to do. Therefore, I will leave it alone. I'm sorry I spoke up at all now, in fact. And I honestly can't believe that I've somehow managed to be seen as part of an "obnoxiously D&D thing". That's not remotely how I intend to come across. I assume, by your shaking your head about it, that you don't intend to be part of that problem either, and yet, I only spoke up because you appeared to me to be doing exactly that sort of thing. So I think that we've fallen into a trap. Let's make peace instead. [/QUOTE]

Verification