Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What are you reading in 2024?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9381485" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Becky Chambers has pretty good characters, but I cannot handle her mangling of some of the SF elements, particularly the harder science elements. It's too much for me (the failing is mine, to be clear). She's the perfect example of a writer who'd be better if they wrote less, not more. I've brought this up before, but she totally unnecessarily devoted pages to describing how the power source of a robot character was definitely not a perpetual motion machine, and in doing so, made it completely clear that it was absolutely undeniably 100% a perpetual motion machine, and she didn't understand basic physics well enough to get that (she was using physics-by-analogy - i.e. "X is like Y" instead of like, understanding thermodynamics*). Whereas if she'd just said the robot had like an unobtainium core and thus infinite power, or just never explained the power source, it would have been fine! And if that was the only time she'd done that I'd shrug it off, but there were multiple other instances in that book alone, of like basic science fail (in most cases which could have been avoided by less description not more). She's like the inverse of Mary Robinette Kowal, who writes excessively dry characters (imho) - not unrealistic ones or cut-outs, just ones it's hard to care much about (the 1950s setting and somewhat uptight nature of most of the characters really does not help), but my god, the hard science of it! The only times I even questioned something, I looked it up, and was like "Oh it is I who was wrong!", with her books - there was particular one thing I <em>hoped</em> she was wrong about but nope, that's real depressing!</p><p></p><p>Murderbot is great but I kind of want to get it all as a big collection when it's done (which it may be, I forget). I have her epic fantasy novel so I need to read that at some point.</p><p></p><p>* = As my wife often teases me about, screwing up thermodynamics is my greatest bugbear in any SF novel or really just any situation!</p><p></p><p>EDIT - You are definitely right to laugh lol, I don't consider myself like a "mansplain-y" kind of awful nerd and actively avoid that behaviour if I sense myself doing it, but anything about thermodynamics and it's like I'm a Manchurian Candidate sleeper agent and I just heard my activation phrase</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9381485, member: 18"] Becky Chambers has pretty good characters, but I cannot handle her mangling of some of the SF elements, particularly the harder science elements. It's too much for me (the failing is mine, to be clear). She's the perfect example of a writer who'd be better if they wrote less, not more. I've brought this up before, but she totally unnecessarily devoted pages to describing how the power source of a robot character was definitely not a perpetual motion machine, and in doing so, made it completely clear that it was absolutely undeniably 100% a perpetual motion machine, and she didn't understand basic physics well enough to get that (she was using physics-by-analogy - i.e. "X is like Y" instead of like, understanding thermodynamics*). Whereas if she'd just said the robot had like an unobtainium core and thus infinite power, or just never explained the power source, it would have been fine! And if that was the only time she'd done that I'd shrug it off, but there were multiple other instances in that book alone, of like basic science fail (in most cases which could have been avoided by less description not more). She's like the inverse of Mary Robinette Kowal, who writes excessively dry characters (imho) - not unrealistic ones or cut-outs, just ones it's hard to care much about (the 1950s setting and somewhat uptight nature of most of the characters really does not help), but my god, the hard science of it! The only times I even questioned something, I looked it up, and was like "Oh it is I who was wrong!", with her books - there was particular one thing I [I]hoped[/I] she was wrong about but nope, that's real depressing! Murderbot is great but I kind of want to get it all as a big collection when it's done (which it may be, I forget). I have her epic fantasy novel so I need to read that at some point. * = As my wife often teases me about, screwing up thermodynamics is my greatest bugbear in any SF novel or really just any situation! EDIT - You are definitely right to laugh lol, I don't consider myself like a "mansplain-y" kind of awful nerd and actively avoid that behaviour if I sense myself doing it, but anything about thermodynamics and it's like I'm a Manchurian Candidate sleeper agent and I just heard my activation phrase [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What are you reading in 2024?
Top