What are you reading in 2026?

A summary of my 2025 reading, with help from StoryGraph:
Inspired by you:

53 books read - 18,889 pages

Most read genres:

14 Thriller
12 Literary
11 Mystery
10 Horror
9 Fantasy

83% fiction, 17% nonfiction

Most read authors:
5 John le Carré
3 Stephen King

average rating 3.97* (biased though, because I don't rate DNFs and I had a lot of DNFs)
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

I've also read a few books in the holidays (technically most of them still 2025, but who looks in that old thread anymore, right? :D):

Spiral, the sequel to Ring by Koji Suzuki
The meta media horror of Ring gets elevated to a new level. Unfortunately the first half is almost a repitition of the first book and has no stakes, no tension. It was very boring. But the writing is still the same immersive realism that I liked in the first book. And than a really nice twist happens that pulls you right in, brings back the dread and adds a new layer to the media meta narrative of the Ring. The second half left me quite satisfied after the boring first half. I really hope he does not another long recap in the third book.

The Great Hunt, WoT#2 by Robert Jordan
Said everything in the last thread. Overall a disappointment after book 1 and I am surprised that this book has a much higher rating than book 1 on storygraph. But the finale was way better than the finale in book 1, maybe thats why. And I realized I am already kinda attached to the characters and the world and I am really happy to have a long series that will accompany for the next months and years to come.

I Who Have Never Known Men by Jacqueline Harpman
This is less a novel with a standard plot structure and more an existentialist meditation of loneliness and the human condition. The setup feels very artificial and constructed and less like a coherent scenario. It feels like a setup for a parable or simile, but you never get an argument by the author, neither explicit nor implicit. Its more a projection space for your own feelings and thoughts.

While I can appreciate this I couldn't help thinking at the end "thats it?". I think it could've helped if the scenario would be less mysterious. I feel like my reflections on the topics and themes of the book were distracted by thoughts about "what happened, what is going on" but these never get answered and are ultimately not the point of the book.

I did enjoyed reading it and feeling the despair and loneliness of the characters but ultimately I don't think it fully deserves the retroactive TikTok-Hype that unburried this book out of obscurity.

What Moves the Dead, Sworn Soldier #1 by T.Kingfisher
Had books by Kingfisher for a long time on my TBR and finally gave the horror series a go. The biggest surprise for me was the humor. Appereantly Kingfisher can't write without making jokes and ... I kinda love it? I think the great part is that the events and the plot were not funny at all and dead serious. But the protagonist copes with a lot of humor as do the other characters - many of them war veterans, which completely fits ( I know veterans and emergency responders and people of other professions where you experience horrible stuff - they all use quite dark humor to cope). It makes the characters honestly feel very real. But of course it also liftens the mood, so if you want to read really scary horror, this is not the book. Its spooky at best and sometimes disgusting, but never really scary due to the jokes.

The protagonist is non-binary, but Kingfisher invents a full nation with a tradition of the soldiers getting a new pronoun "kon" when they get sworn in (I use "they/them" in this post for simplicitys sake). I honestly couldn't see why that was necessary. Couldn't they be just non-binary? Why the need for a fantasy nation with fantasy pronouns and according lore drops in the book when it had nothing to do with the story? It felt like she had just this idea and shoehorned it in. But as a reader you just go with the flow and accept it, she doesn't dwelve too long on this topic (its a short read in general). Plus it generated an interesting reading experience: Because it never gets established what pronouns they used before they were sworned in as a soldier, my inner image of them warped and changed between more male read and more female read appereances.

Also the hero so damn likeable. They are nice, smart, funny and feel human. Its a nice change after all the books with moody, gloomy, depressive protagonists or anti-heroes I've read. You just want to root for them.

The resolution kinda destroys the gothic in this "gothic Horror" IMO. But I loved the characters and their banter so much, that I forgive the author for that overexplanations that makes it all feel mundane.
 
Last edited:


I finished reading Lisa Mason's Cyberweb. Such a shame the author died before she could finish another volume in the series. Did a re-read of C.S. Lewis' The Silver Chair. I feel like Narnia gets weirder in this book, and it works for me a whole lot. Also notable is a proto-Underdark setting.

Now I'm reading Jeff Somers' The Electric Church.

On Rex Stout's "The Red Box" on my reread of the Wolfe corpus.
One of these days I'll get around to checking out the Nero Wolfe tales. Been meaning to ever since he came up in When Gravity Fails.

I had a stressful morning, with a crisis among Mom’s caregivers. Once it settled down, I curled up with an audiobook of Clark Ashton Smith’s stories (The End Of The Story, volume 1 of the 5-volume set from Night Shade Books). The readings are uniformly great and the prose, oh man, the prose is so great. Along with Jack Vance, Smith is one of people many bad writers like Gygax think they’re writing like but aren’t. Smith knows his vocabulary and grammar and is complete command of this, like this:
Clark Ashton Smith's grasp of language and atmosphere is tops in my book. Like Vance, it's not about using archaic words for their own sake, but rather understanding their context, the mood they evoke. Later on, Gene Wolfe understood that.
 

I just put a reservation for the next Dresden Files book, Twelve Months, at my local library. I should have acted sooner, since there are nearly a dozen people in line for it ahead of me.
 

Since we're talking numbers, here, I read like 210 books last year, with another ten that I noped out of at some point along the way. (Some of the novels I finished, I might have been happier if I hadn't, but oh comma well.) Most of my reading seems to have been various sorts of crime and thriller fiction, but there was some horror, and some SF and fantasy in there, too. Plus stuff like Tropper or Everett that's not really clearly in a genre. (Moore and Hiaasen are both funny, but they're also IMO clearly fantasy and crime fiction, respectively.) Some nonfiction, but nothing super scholarly, there, just stuff that seemed interesting to me on like a surface level. Toward the end of the year, I started looking at how to work longer things into my reading, I'm curious to see if I can keep doing that some, I miss reading longer things.
 

Read Everything Must Go by Dorian Lynskey (he does the excellent Origin Story podcast alongside Ian Dunt) which is a lengthy, comprehensive, and eclectic discussion about how we have imagined the end of the world and why. As such, it covers the Black Death, Revelations, the Year Without a Summer, the Chicxulub meteor, On the Beach, pandemics, climate change, nuclear war, AI, zombies, and so many other visions of the end of humanity.

I appreciated the insight that we always think that we’re at a special turning point in human history (which is partly why apocalypses are attractive) and the idea that we tend to have a sort of collective decisive amnesia about pandemics (such as the last one or 1919, which killed more people than WW1) because they’re so impersonal and counter to our human narrative - they just happen, not really because of anything we’ve done or decided to do.
 

I just finished reading Novalyne Price Ellis's 1986 memoir, One Who Walked Alone: Robert E. Howard, The Final Years, and I feel like I've been punched in the gut.

To very quickly recap, Novalyn Price was a schoolteacher who also dreamed of being a writer. To practice her literary skills, she kept a diary in which she recorded not only things that had happened, as well as her thoughts and feelings about them, but entire conversations that she'd had. Word-for-word, she'd write down things that people had said to her, and she to them. While she eventually turned away from writing in order to focus on her teaching career, she would eventually publish this, her first book, in which she recounted her relationship with Robert E. Howard (creator of Conan the Barbarian, Solomon Kane, and other larger than life figures), covering their brief introduction in 1931 before focusing heavily on their relationship from 1934 through 1936, the latter being the year that Howard took his own life.

I purchased this book several years ago, after having watched the book's film adaptation The Whole Wide World. I was very interested in Howard's work at the time, reading a large number of his stories, and wanted to know more about him as a person. Since the rule about the book always being better than the film is almost (though not always) true, I tracked down a copy of this and set to reading it.

I only got about a third of the way through before I stopped then, leaving it on my shelf for quite some time before starting over again last month.

It didn't take my long to remember why I'd had such a hard time with it.

I don't want to say that this book is a slog, because I don't think that's accurate; a slog is something that's hard to get through because it's (to my mind) uninteresting, filled with dense material that seems to inhibit interest and confound enjoyment. This, by contrast, was a captivating tale...but what captures you is the tragedy of it all.

Months ago, I attended a rendition of Antigone that a friend of mine was starring in. In this slightly-updated take on the classic, one of the characters noted how (to paraphrase) "Tragedy is not simply death. Death is universal; it comes to everyone. Tragedy is not so common; what makes something tragic is that it's a catastrophe."

I'm not sure if that's true or not, but I suspect that there's something to it, because the tragedy of this story isn't simply how it ends. Nor is it even in how the characters of this tale seem to be their own worst enemies, with their strengths turned against them, ultimately bringing them to sadness that didn't have to be. Rather, to me it's in how Bob's suicide and Novalyn's heartbreak seems like it could have been avoided if only they'd understood each other just a little better.

Part of what makes this hit so hard is the narrative nature of the book. While narrative fiction is common, narrative nonfiction strikes me as being rare in the extreme. Most nonfiction works, when they're about an individual or group of individuals, tend to portray them as figures more than people, lacking the closeness that comes from knowing them personally. Not here. Here, we have the firsthand experiences of someone who spoke often with Bob Howard, who could relate his own words as he spoke them, talk about how he dressed and his quirks and habits, his dark moods and turns of phrase. If the quality of characterization in fiction is to make fictional people seem real, then narrative nonfiction is the goal that such works shoot for, because the people are real.

The result is that this story isn't simply a story, but real life, and so hits extremely hard.

The tale of Bob and Novalyne's relationship is one fraught with a lack of understanding, despite the two of them trying to make sense of each other. In this regard, I won't say that Novalyne is an unreliable narrator, because that term (to me) represents a device used in fiction, whereby the author intends the reader to understand that something is happening other than the narrator is relaying. Rather, what's here is a sequence of events told through a single, real person's point of view. Other people in the story talk and act; Novalyne talks and acts, but because this is her diary, we also get to know what she thinks and feels.

Time and again, Novalyn dismisses the idea that Bob Howard would ever take his own life if and when his mother died, despite having had family friends of the Howards warn her that he would. If anything, she seems to resent the idea; plenty of other people lose their mothers, and after they grieve, go right on living. Moreover, she doesn't understand why Bob's father (himself a medical doctor) can't take care of his wife, and why Bob insists that he has to be the one to do it; that question is never satisfactorily answered, though various reasons (excuses?) are hinted at.

Likewise, Bob struggles to see beyond himself, despite Novalyn's at times Herculean efforts to reach out to him. He can't imagine schools and schoolteachers actually caring about their students, despite Novalyn's repeatedly impressing upon him how much she wants to help her own pupils achieve as much as they can, since his own teachers (according to him) never cared about whether he lived or died. He makes efforts to pursue her romantically—though to my reading they had a half-heartedness that underscored a timidity beneath his bluster, representing someone who didn't know how to communicate affection and was afraid of being scorned for that—even as he goes on about how a woman only chains a man down, taking away his freedom.

In many ways, the book is a study in contrasts. Bob's come through clearly, as he bemoans not having a great cause or a great love, saying that a man (or a woman) needs as least one in order to live, while Novalyn's are subtler, portraying someone who admires Bob for what sets him apart even as she grows exasperated with how he's distanced himself from others.

Re-reading that last sentence, I think that really summarizes the poignancy here: Bob believes himself unable to live like an ordinary man, and is broken by how he can't live as one of the titans whom he writes about, whereas Novalyn admires him for his looking beyond the ordinary, even as she wishes that he'd live an ordinary life.

The catastrophe is in how close they seem to come, and yet ultimately fail, to recognizing and resolving those differences.
 
Last edited:

Enchanted Trinkets Complete

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top