What are you reading in 2026?

Now I'm reading The Ten Percent Thief by Lavanya Lakshminarayan.
I’ll be looking forward to your thoughts on this.

I reread Hyperion and am halfway through The Fall of Hyperion. It’s been interesting, in several senses. Simmons’ prose is absolutely as good as I remembered, and so are the good parts of these books. The overall cosmology and story, the growing darkness and the eucatastrophe, th complexity of the threads of plot and the elegance of their weave, the ways individual lives connect so intimately to the great movements of history and physics, the astonishing beauties of places like God’s Grove, the marvelous wonders like the River Tethys, and on and on.

But then there’s the stuff I’ve learned to look for since the 1990s. Everyone is straight: there is one possibly gay couple, in Rachel’s story - a guy “and his friend”, who may be living together or may just be buddies in business together - and a couple homophobic jokes from Martin Silenus. That’s it. Everyone is cisgendered. There are people who do radical things with genetic engineering and body sculpting, but no hint of doing anything with gender.

Apart from the Templars, there are no vegetarians. Nearly everyone happily enjoys beef on many occasions; cloned meat is mentioned disparagingly as something for the poorest of the poor.

And that’s before the Islamophobia I noticed even then.

I’m still enjoying this reread, but I think it’ll be my last unless sometime I’m doing specific research. And that won’t be general pleasure reading.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I finally finished Wot #3 and will take a break here, fitting IMO because if I remember correctly the first 3 books were originally planned to be the first one of a trilogy.

It felt much longer han #2 and almost as long #1 - but appereantly was the shortest one? Very weird. Overall I liked it more than #2, but it felt so loaded and I am bit annoyed that once again the super sorcerer women needed rescue by the men.

I did really enjoy Mats POV, they were a lot of fun. I did enjoy a lot the POV of Nynaeve, Elayne & Egwene, the mystery of finding the undercover evil Aes Sedai was a lot of fun - unfortunatey the resolution was really dumb and disappointing. In general the white tower as an institution felt extremely incompetent and did not fit the reputation that was build up in the first two books. These sorceresses basically rule the world? Thats hard to believe.

I missed Rands POV. Perrin was OK. Overall the plot felt kinda forced. Like the author really did want X to happen so everything needs to bent towards that. I start to understand where Sanderson got some of his annoying quirks from. At least Sanderson get it over with, but I am only three books in WoT and already so annoyed by "the wheel weaves..." as a meta self aware justification for every plot contrivance.
 
Last edited:

In general the white tower as an institution felt extremely incompetent and did not fit the reputation that was build up in the first two books. These sorceresses basically rule the world? Thats hard to believe.
That is a major theme of the series, ultimately: nobody rules the world, especially those who think they are powerful.
 


I read the Batman graphic novel Arkham Asylum, by Grant Morrison.

Good, but does not quite work for me. A bit too opaque in both conveying the story elements (how the interwoven 1920s arkham story eventually connects into the current batman one) and graphically hard to read. That lends a bit to the intended horror and insanity themes, but I mostly found that annoying and caused me to read faster to try to get a better sense of things rather than to linger and ponder/savor things. I am sure I missed a lot of specific symbolism of the varied art.

I do not really care for Batman's portrayal here, when pushed and stressed he is an unpleasant person. There is a lot of potential for doing interesting things with how mentally off batman is and him recognizing and fearing it in Arkham, this particular delve did not particularly show me aspects this way that seemed interesting to me.

A bunch of the villains have aspects thrown in that are really not fun too. The mad hatter's pedophilia suggestions, Two-Face descending into literal incontinence. I did like how the art and writing and lettering shifted depending on who the villain was. A bit too obscured for my tastes on most of them though, like a movie or TV show with very dark scenes where details are often hard to make out.

I much prefer the portrayals of mad villains in say Batman the Animated Series such as Scarface or even Maximillian Zeus whose episodes I have recently seen for the first time. Creepy, engaging, and very fun with interesting interactions. Stuff that seems like it could work well in a Ravenloft game.

I have high hopes for the next graphic novel in line from my neighbor's collection A Death in the Family.
 

The best part of Arkham Asylum for me was some of the amazing blue and blue-green hues in Dave McKean’s palette. Overall, it just didn’t work for me. But overreach is a thing that happens sometimes when very talented people, which those two are, go experimenting.
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top