Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What armor can druids wear? Is there a way to get a decent AC?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6383485" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Last night I was thinking about it, and I came up with exactly why MerricB's interpretation of <em>Barkskin</em> just doesn't sit right with me-- that shields and cover do not grant additional AC points over the 16 from <em>Barkskin</em>. Here's why:</p><p></p><p>We have a guy standing around completely naked and has no DEX modifier. Right now he has an AC of 10.</p><p>He puts on a shield (+2 AC). Now, he has an AC of 12.</p><p>He goes behind 3/4ers cover, say behind an arrow slit (+5 AC). Now, he has an AC of 17.</p><p></p><p>A druid now walks up behind him and casts <em>Barkskin</em> on this guy... and his AC <em>now drops a point because of it</em> to AC 16?</p><p></p><p>How do we explain that? The shield hasn't changed-- he's still wearing it and thus it's still granting a +2 to his AC. The cover hasn't changed-- he's still behind that arrow slit and it's still granting a +5 to his AC. Thus the only thing we can say is that by making his skin tough like bark, it's actually now making him <em>more able to be hurt</em> than when he was just standing there naked. His "natural armor" AC has dropped from AC 10 to AC 9... because that's the only way you get back to AC 16 when you add in the unchanging shield and 3/4ers cover. Basically, the <em>Barkskin</em> spell is making things worse for the guy than if he had been left alone.</p><p></p><p>That just sounds crazy to me. And I cannot fathom the idea that this is actually how <em>Barkskin</em> is supposed to work or why you'd interpret it that way-- a spell that in fact can make things worse for you by getting it applied... regardless of how differently they wrote <em>Mage Armor</em> or <em>Unarmored Defense</em> in comparison to it.</p><p></p><p>So I'm going to go with my instincts on this one. <em>Barkskin</em> turns your skin into what is functionally chainmail armor (AC 16). I'm not going to include any DEX bonus, because you don't get a DEX bonus when wearing chainmail so that makes sense to me. But any other things that increase your AC when wearing chainmail will also work when under the Barkskin spell. That includes shields and cover.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6383485, member: 7006"] Last night I was thinking about it, and I came up with exactly why MerricB's interpretation of [I]Barkskin[/I] just doesn't sit right with me-- that shields and cover do not grant additional AC points over the 16 from [I]Barkskin[/I]. Here's why: We have a guy standing around completely naked and has no DEX modifier. Right now he has an AC of 10. He puts on a shield (+2 AC). Now, he has an AC of 12. He goes behind 3/4ers cover, say behind an arrow slit (+5 AC). Now, he has an AC of 17. A druid now walks up behind him and casts [I]Barkskin[/I] on this guy... and his AC [I]now drops a point because of it[/I] to AC 16? How do we explain that? The shield hasn't changed-- he's still wearing it and thus it's still granting a +2 to his AC. The cover hasn't changed-- he's still behind that arrow slit and it's still granting a +5 to his AC. Thus the only thing we can say is that by making his skin tough like bark, it's actually now making him [I]more able to be hurt[/I] than when he was just standing there naked. His "natural armor" AC has dropped from AC 10 to AC 9... because that's the only way you get back to AC 16 when you add in the unchanging shield and 3/4ers cover. Basically, the [I]Barkskin[/I] spell is making things worse for the guy than if he had been left alone. That just sounds crazy to me. And I cannot fathom the idea that this is actually how [I]Barkskin[/I] is supposed to work or why you'd interpret it that way-- a spell that in fact can make things worse for you by getting it applied... regardless of how differently they wrote [I]Mage Armor[/I] or [I]Unarmored Defense[/I] in comparison to it. So I'm going to go with my instincts on this one. [I]Barkskin[/I] turns your skin into what is functionally chainmail armor (AC 16). I'm not going to include any DEX bonus, because you don't get a DEX bonus when wearing chainmail so that makes sense to me. But any other things that increase your AC when wearing chainmail will also work when under the Barkskin spell. That includes shields and cover. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What armor can druids wear? Is there a way to get a decent AC?
Top