Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="w_earle_wheeler" data-source="post: 3973206" data-attributes="member: 35955">I've had some fun times playing barbarians, usually multi-classed.I didn't vote in any direction for the bard, because while I've played one, he died too quickly for me to decide if I liked him or not. I love the 3e cleric, and I'm always willing to play one in a group that doesn't have a cleric. With domains, feats and multi-classing, clerics were the most fun for me to play.The druid is, strangely, the only class I've never wanted to play in 3e. It just didn't interest me.The fighter is great. I loved the ability to customize.I've always liked playing the 3e monk even though he never really fit in or hit the &quot;sweet spot&quot; in level.I like the paladin, but I've never had a chance to play one as a PC in 3e.I've only played a ranger as a minor multi-class buff. Like the druid, the class never interested me.And as for the wizard versus the sorcerer, I've always preferred the wizard. So, in order of fun, I'd have to say my top 3 are:ClericWizardFighterMy favorite clerics were multi-classed. One was a half-orc barbarian/cleric who had the trickery domain. The other was a dwarf fighter/cleric designed to be a problem solver and reserve tanker. I've always wanted to build a nice cleric/rogue combination but haven't gotten around to it.When playing a wizard, I almost always think way too hard about what I'm going to do when I'm grappled or tied-up and imprisoned without a spellbook. For this reason, I always took eschew spell material and spell mastery and made sure I knew a variety of spells that could be used without somatic or verbal components without the need of metamagic.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="w_earle_wheeler, post: 3973206, member: 35955"] I've had some fun times playing barbarians, usually multi-classed. I didn't vote in any direction for the bard, because while I've played one, he died too quickly for me to decide if I liked him or not. I love the 3e cleric, and I'm always willing to play one in a group that doesn't have a cleric. With domains, feats and multi-classing, clerics were the most fun for me to play. The druid is, strangely, the only class I've never wanted to play in 3e. It just didn't interest me. The fighter is great. I loved the ability to customize. I've always liked playing the 3e monk even though he never really fit in or hit the "sweet spot" in level. I like the paladin, but I've never had a chance to play one as a PC in 3e. I've only played a ranger as a minor multi-class buff. Like the druid, the class never interested me. And as for the wizard versus the sorcerer, I've always preferred the wizard. So, in order of fun, I'd have to say my top 3 are: Cleric Wizard Fighter My favorite clerics were multi-classed. One was a half-orc barbarian/cleric who had the trickery domain. The other was a dwarf fighter/cleric designed to be a problem solver and reserve tanker. I've always wanted to build a nice cleric/rogue combination but haven't gotten around to it. When playing a wizard, I almost always think way too hard about what I'm going to do when I'm grappled or tied-up and imprisoned without a spellbook. For this reason, I always took eschew spell material and spell mastery and made sure I knew a variety of spells that could be used without somatic or verbal components without the need of metamagic. [/QUOTE]

Verification