What do you consider "de facto" core?

What do you consider "de facto" core?

  • Complete series (classic)

    Votes: 103 41.5%
  • Complete series (new)

    Votes: 81 32.7%
  • Eberron Campaign Setting

    Votes: 24 9.7%
  • Environment series

    Votes: 32 12.9%
  • Expanded Psionics Handbook

    Votes: 83 33.5%
  • Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting

    Votes: 28 11.3%
  • Heroes of ... series

    Votes: 23 9.3%
  • Magic Item Compendium

    Votes: 110 44.4%
  • Misc Alternate Systems

    Votes: 11 4.4%
  • Monster Manual series

    Votes: 124 50.0%
  • Monster Types series

    Votes: 33 13.3%
  • Planar

    Votes: 32 12.9%
  • Races of ... series

    Votes: 54 21.8%
  • Spell Compendium

    Votes: 123 49.6%
  • Unearthed Arcana

    Votes: 56 22.6%
  • Other (please explain!)

    Votes: 68 27.4%

Core is Core.

What I use in my games is generally expanded from this (almost always including SC, MIC, and any of the MMs/FF). But that's not useful for discussion, so why bother giving it a name?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Other: Core is PH, DMG and MM. The rest are Optional.

I allow any option from any book from any publisher, as long as it looks ok and fits my campaign.

/M
 

Maggan said:
Other: Core is PH, DMG and MM. The rest are Optional.

I allow any option from any book from any publisher, as long as it looks ok and fits my campaign.
Ditto.

There are quite a few sources I consider [kind of] "core" for me as a DM though. So really, yes and no.

Eh, whatever.
 

I voted for a bunch of stuff, but in retrospec I guess I only consider the Core 3 to be "Core"... de facto or not.

However, I don't run anything remotely "Core Only".
 

Aus_Snow said:
Ditto.

There are quite a few sources I consider [kind of] "core" for me as a DM though. So really, yes and no.

Eh, whatever.

Ah, you mean "corish". It's an ancient word meaning "sorta core D&D, but not really". It dates back to the Cornish population of the British Isles, sometime around 350 AD. Which is actually quite perplexing, since D&D wasn't even invented then. :D

/M
 

You should've listed PHB2 and DMG2. I wouldn't use the phrase 'de facto core' but the books that are closest to core without actually being core are, imo:

XPH, PHB2, DMG2, SC, MIC

In a specific setting, such as Eberron, the campaign setting book becomes core too.
 

OK, so we've established that "core" is the PHB, DMG & MM. I agree with that, because that is core and you need no other book to play. I view this poll in a broader category, "core options," meaning that these optional rules I accept with little or no exception. The PHB II is not listed, and it should be, because there is some really good stuff in there. That's on my list.
 


Maggan said:
Ah, you mean "corish". It's an ancient word meaning "sorta core D&D, but not really". It dates back to the Cornish population of the British Isles, sometime around 350 AD. Which is actually quite perplexing, since D&D wasn't even invented then. :D
Sure it was. Those guys at Gleam Axe were pimping it 24/7. Caused something of a momentary stir, I believe. No records exist though. :confused:
 

Hussar said:
Other - None of the above. Core is core. Full stop.
What he said.

I might (and do) allow other stuff in my games, but it is never automatic, which is what core really means IMC.

EDIT: Ooh, I always use the swift- and immediate-actions rules, so the sidebar describing them in half a dozen different books could be described as de facto core. I'd still prefer a different (less potentially confusing) term, though.


glass.
 
Last edited:

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top