Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
[+] What features should a "Advanced 5E" have?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Haldrik" data-source="post: 8060662" data-attributes="member: 6694221"><p>[USER=6879661]@TheSword[/USER] and [USER=6855114]@Helldritch[/USER],</p><p></p><p>I support the 70% support model that WotC uses. But that percentage includes my voice and desires. I am often the majority on many D&D 5e designs, and occasionally the minority. That is normal.</p><p></p><p>The abilities are mechanics that are so central, deep, and fundamental to the gaming system. Everything depends on the abilities. It is a high priority to ensure that the abilities work as well as possible.</p><p></p><p>I would find it satisfactory to have an improved ability system as a variant option. Unfortunately, the current abilities are so klugy and baked into everything, that a variant seems less practicable. For example, monsters, skills, classes, all organize around the six abilities. Short of making continual recalculations for every effect, or rewriting the rules, it is difficult to imagine how a variant can work even when desirable.</p><p></p><p>(Possibly, devolve calculations to more specialized mechanics, and then allow players different choices for how to group these specialized mechanics into an ability. For example, instead of a Dexterity bonus, make an initiative bonus, and the player decides if initiative should fall under Dexterity or an other ability such as Perception.)</p><p></p><p>For this reason, the difficulty of even offering a variant, the D&D tradition suffers edition after edition with substandard ability design.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Haldrik, post: 8060662, member: 6694221"] [USER=6879661]@TheSword[/USER] and [USER=6855114]@Helldritch[/USER], I support the 70% support model that WotC uses. But that percentage includes my voice and desires. I am often the majority on many D&D 5e designs, and occasionally the minority. That is normal. The abilities are mechanics that are so central, deep, and fundamental to the gaming system. Everything depends on the abilities. It is a high priority to ensure that the abilities work as well as possible. I would find it satisfactory to have an improved ability system as a variant option. Unfortunately, the current abilities are so klugy and baked into everything, that a variant seems less practicable. For example, monsters, skills, classes, all organize around the six abilities. Short of making continual recalculations for every effect, or rewriting the rules, it is difficult to imagine how a variant can work even when desirable. (Possibly, devolve calculations to more specialized mechanics, and then allow players different choices for how to group these specialized mechanics into an ability. For example, instead of a Dexterity bonus, make an initiative bonus, and the player decides if initiative should fall under Dexterity or an other ability such as Perception.) For this reason, the difficulty of even offering a variant, the D&D tradition suffers edition after edition with substandard ability design. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
[+] What features should a "Advanced 5E" have?
Top