What is canon?

radferth

First Post
This message is inspired by the touch spell & sneak attacks threads, but addresses a much larger question. What is the canonical status of rules taken from the class books (e.g. tome and blood, sword and fist, etc.)? I know that some is definitely canon, to wit the polymorph spell updates; and that some is definitely optional (all the prestige classes, new weapon, equipment, and spells). However, I have noticed that the books sometimes engage in explaning the rules, and I wondered if folks considers these interpretations official, or just one author's opinion.

The example that brought about this question is, of course, the sneak attack and touch spells discusion. I know that Tome and Blood pretty clearly states that any spell that rolls to hit is eligible for sneak attack damage, if the caster has sneak attack. Is this interpretation anywhere is the PHB, DMG, or SRD? If not, does its appearane in Tome and Blood make it an official rule, or an optional one?
 

log in or register to remove this ad







I consider the Core Books, Splatbooks, Capbooks (ELH, D&Dg, etc..) and Eratta sheets to be canon... and FAQ supplements those with clarifications.
 
Last edited:

Poor radferth, the thread has been completely destroyed.

I don't know if the rule is in the big 3, but if it is not it is optional. Anything not in the PHB, DMG, and MM is considered optional. And with rule 0, you can greatly change what's in the big 3.

Now, some people form a hierachy of of optional items. Forinstance many people thing wizards products are less optional then third party. Some people think stuff in magazines is even more optional then that. It all depends on who you game with and what they feel is right for their game.
 

In all seriousness, I'd say just about any 3e product with the official Wizards logo slapped on it is canon. Now Core... well, that's another matter entirely.
 

Remove ads

Top