Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="WhosDaDungeonMaster" data-source="post: 7555655">I find it interesting about the debate of spells and duration considering the designers built-in the alternative system of non-cyclical initiative (for those of you who forgot, it is page 270 of the DMG).Obviously, they saw no issue with spell durations using a variant system. There are plenty of ways to rule it so spells will still have all their potential effects, sometimes in favor of the characters and sometimes not (if they are the target of a spell).The simplest way is to say for each round of duration a spell has, the target of the spell benefits or is hindered for one of its rounds. Sure, it is an adjustment on the wording of many spells which affect a target until "your next turn", etc., but it is hardly a big problem to adjust for.If you think it is a big problem, just don't try this variant... maybe it is too difficult for you to handle? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>