Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Masquerade" data-source="post: 3805335" data-attributes="member: 25445">Of existing D&amp;D products, my favorite art definitely comes from 3.0 Magic of Faerun. Sam Wood's &quot;gnome artificer,&quot; Carlo Arellano's &quot;incantatrix,&quot; Carlo Arellano's &quot;spellfire channeler,&quot; Sam Wood's &quot;haunting tune,&quot; Carlo Arellano's &quot;undead bane weapon,&quot; Carlo Arellano's &quot;mage-killer&quot;... all easily among my favorite pieces of D&amp;D art. d20 Past had some fantastic pieces in it as well.To answer the actual question, I think the core art from 3.X would be the best starting point.Generally, though, I'm not sure I enjoy the notion that 4e art should resemble anything that came before it. I would like to see WotC pick a few talented, young artists from deviantArt and let them take things in a new direction. (And I'm not necessarily talking about this &quot;anime&quot; bugbear that many members here find so threatening.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Masquerade, post: 3805335, member: 25445"] Of existing D&D products, my favorite art definitely comes from 3.0 Magic of Faerun. Sam Wood's "gnome artificer," Carlo Arellano's "incantatrix," Carlo Arellano's "spellfire channeler," Sam Wood's "haunting tune," Carlo Arellano's "undead bane weapon," Carlo Arellano's "mage-killer"... all easily among my favorite pieces of D&D art. d20 Past had some fantastic pieces in it as well. To answer the actual question, I think the core art from 3.X would be the best starting point. Generally, though, I'm not sure I enjoy the notion that 4e art should resemble anything that came before it. I would like to see WotC pick a few talented, young artists from deviantArt and let them take things in a new direction. (And I'm not necessarily talking about this "anime" bugbear that many members here find so threatening.) [/QUOTE]

Verification