Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Garthanos" data-source="post: 8645338" data-attributes="member: 82504">Exactly so we ignore it. you were or appeared to be claiming it is changing enough to &quot;cancel&quot; the change in force due to mass...&nbsp; it is not cancelling anything about force. (assuming force of damage from a fall)Your wording indicating that the constant of gravity was somehow countering/cancelling the increased force due to increase in mass.&nbsp; It does not.This is very much not what you said (if it were i would not dispute it and you can simply consider what you mean not in dispute just how you expressed it)(also a trivial truth) And you were talking directly about force and how mass increased it but acceleration was cancelling that, ie so now it is a sudden change up and you are claiming the rest of the sentence was about velocity? However your original statement stated A cancelled the increase in force due to mass by being inversely proportional ....&nbsp;&nbsp; and if you are looking for force (* or subsequently energy which is a better measure) from impact ie falling damage remains increased due to mass it remains higher for larger objects, (yes with g remaining close enough to the same for normal objects etc.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Garthanos, post: 8645338, member: 82504"] Exactly so we ignore it. you were or appeared to be claiming it is changing enough to "cancel" the [B]change in force[/B] due to mass... it is not cancelling anything about force. (assuming force of damage from a fall) Your wording indicating that the constant of gravity was somehow countering/cancelling the increased force due to increase in mass. It does not. This is very much not what you said (if it were i would not dispute it and you can simply consider what you mean not in dispute just how you expressed it) (also a trivial truth) And you were talking directly about force and how mass increased it but acceleration was cancelling that, ie so now it is a sudden change up and you are claiming the rest of the sentence was about velocity? However your original statement stated A cancelled the increase in force due to mass by being inversely proportional .... and if you are looking for force (* or subsequently energy which is a better measure) from impact ie falling damage remains increased due to mass it remains higher for larger objects, (yes with g remaining close enough to the same for normal objects etc.) [/QUOTE]

Verification