Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What skill levels would academics have?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 2990228" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>Well, let's look at it from a rules perspective: </p><p></p><p>The Field Scienstist gains the ability "Minor Breakthrough" at Level 5. </p><p>Minor Breakthrough gets him a bonus to reputation (and wealth), representing the fame for his work. </p><p>Assuming the character took the optimal path to this ability, he would be an 8th level character, with a maximum possible number of ranks of 11. He has an effective Reputation of +4 (plus any additional modifiers) in the scientific community. </p><p>Certainly not every "renown" scientist needs to become a Field Scientist (this would probably be indeed difficult for most academics, since they are probably not heroic characters), but these gives some parameters to work with.</p><p></p><p>In D20 Modern, reputation is a actual a character "attribute", so to be _really_ known for your expertise, you probably need a good reputation score first. A Score of +4 is sufficient for the Field Scientist. A Smart Hero/Ordinary could reach this at level 10, with a maximum possible number of ranks of 13. </p><p></p><p>So, any "renown" academic might have between 11 to 14 ranks and a reputation score of 4 or more. </p><p></p><p>For a Harvard-Type Academic, maybe the Field Scientist "Major Breakthrough"-ability could be the guideline. As a Smart 3 / Field Scientist 10, the character would have a maximum number of ranks of 16, and a reputation bonus of +8 in the scientific community. </p><p>A Smart Ordinary 10 / Charismatic Ordinary 7 could reach similar values. (reputation bonus +8, maximum ranks 20). </p><p></p><p>This is all ignoring feats, talents or abilities modifying the skill or reputation scores.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 2990228, member: 710"] Well, let's look at it from a rules perspective: The Field Scienstist gains the ability "Minor Breakthrough" at Level 5. Minor Breakthrough gets him a bonus to reputation (and wealth), representing the fame for his work. Assuming the character took the optimal path to this ability, he would be an 8th level character, with a maximum possible number of ranks of 11. He has an effective Reputation of +4 (plus any additional modifiers) in the scientific community. Certainly not every "renown" scientist needs to become a Field Scientist (this would probably be indeed difficult for most academics, since they are probably not heroic characters), but these gives some parameters to work with. In D20 Modern, reputation is a actual a character "attribute", so to be _really_ known for your expertise, you probably need a good reputation score first. A Score of +4 is sufficient for the Field Scientist. A Smart Hero/Ordinary could reach this at level 10, with a maximum possible number of ranks of 13. So, any "renown" academic might have between 11 to 14 ranks and a reputation score of 4 or more. For a Harvard-Type Academic, maybe the Field Scientist "Major Breakthrough"-ability could be the guideline. As a Smart 3 / Field Scientist 10, the character would have a maximum number of ranks of 16, and a reputation bonus of +8 in the scientific community. A Smart Ordinary 10 / Charismatic Ordinary 7 could reach similar values. (reputation bonus +8, maximum ranks 20). This is all ignoring feats, talents or abilities modifying the skill or reputation scores. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What skill levels would academics have?
Top