Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 7042530" data-attributes="member: 5142">Great. You can whack a guy with a sword in armor, so you have your paladin, barbarian, or ranger already. Awesome. You can already cast powerful arcane spells. So who needs a bard, sorcerer, or warlock when we already have the wizard? Awesome. This comes across as false equivalence and disrespectful on your part, Corwin. It's hardly the same, so I respectfully request that you cut it out if you want to actually demonstrate that you holding this discussion in good faith. So it's your experience against mine? I guess your experience is simply right on virtue of being Corwin as opposed to actually being right or presenting a coherent argument. I have seen my share of warlords in play too, and I have played warlords as well, and I disagree with your assessment, Corwin. Though it does seem that you are describing a point guard and not a coach.  It seems that we are at impasse then. But I will point out that what you are describing is what the Battlemaster can already do, to a limited extent. Many warlord advocates simply want to take the Battlemaster and expand it to a proper full class and not just a 1/3 Warlord.</blockquote>