Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="raleel" data-source="post: 7048015" data-attributes="member: 21664">I can tell you what it is for me - played it in 4e, was one of my favorite characters, if not my favorite. It has intricate and complex tools. It made full use of the action economy. It was highly team focused, and I am the guy who likes playing team focused characters. Highly tactical and complex, and frankly, not relying on some external power. He didn't spend his whole action healing you (and neither did the 4e cleric mostly). He attacked and healed, or attacked and granted CA, or attacked and shifted another party member. I've had Good fun with the 5e bard, but it's not quite the same. Just not enough knobs for my taste. Maybe needed to MC diviner with Lucky and and Shield Mastery or something <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="raleel, post: 7048015, member: 21664"] I can tell you what it is for me - played it in 4e, was one of my favorite characters, if not my favorite. It has intricate and complex tools. It made full use of the action economy. It was highly team focused, and I am the guy who likes playing team focused characters. Highly tactical and complex, and frankly, not relying on some external power. He didn't spend his whole action healing you (and neither did the 4e cleric mostly). He attacked and healed, or attacked and granted CA, or attacked and shifted another party member. I've had Good fun with the 5e bard, but it's not quite the same. Just not enough knobs for my taste. Maybe needed to MC diviner with Lucky and and Shield Mastery or something :) [/QUOTE]

Verification