Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 7049272" data-attributes="member: 6701872">That's a mischaracterization of people saying that the specific thing being declared as minimum requirement to qualify as including the specific style in question might not actually fit.Actually, I've already detailed how you can in fact stop that particular thing being read into your statements. Much like I have stopped you from reading racism into my posts (before this point, at least) by not specifically bringing up one or both of our races (whatever they might be) because they are not of direct and immediate relevance to the points I am seeking to make (by which, so that this is as clear as it can be, I mean that my points can be made without those mentions, and my points are not weakened in any way by not including those mentions).This is not a demand that anyone has made. "Demand" is even too strong a word. I did not make a demand of anyone, I made a recommendation, and that recommendation was to not mention a (vaguely, in most cases) relevant historical fact at every opportunity, which is a massively different number of instances from "never."</blockquote>