Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What the warlord needs in 5e and how to make it happen.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gradine" data-source="post: 7055210" data-attributes="member: 57112"><p>So, my personal thinking is that the Order of the Avatar Mystic makes the need for Warlord much lower, rather than much greater, which takes me back to my original point waaaay up-thread that I'd rather, again personally, that if WotC is going spend their resources on creating 5e versions of older classes, that they spend those resources on classes that present new mechanics within 5e, rather than mechanics that already exist but with a slightly different coat of paint slapped on. I don't even think the case can be made anymore that the original mechanics of the Warlord exist in 5e but could stand to be expanded on (which is the argument I'd make in requesting, say a real 5e Spellthief or possibly even an Archivist, which I think could be handled as a Wizard archetype); the Order of the Avatar's mantles certainly take care on that front. There are 5e martial characters that have resource management, so "if it's martial it has to be at-will" argument simply holds no water.</p><p></p><p>The best argument for a dedicated 5e Warlord class, at this point, are anti-magic fields. Which amounts to requesting that martial characters be even more versatile and powerful in a rare corner case of the game where every other type of character is effectively already neutered (which is why anti-magic fields are an awful game mechanic 99% of the time and best used extremely sparingly for best effect and therefore are really not worth designing an entire class of character around).</p><p></p><p>Again, I am not anti-Warlord by any stretch (my longest-played 4e character was a Warlord); but I had few problems converting that character to 5e before Order of the Avatar and definitely have no problems doing so now. I wouldn't be upset to seeing a new, fully formed Warlord class show up anytime, but I'd be disappointed that my admittedly more niche pre-5e, more mechanically unique classes weren't getting more love first. Because 5e is has already given so much love to the mechanical underpinnings of the Warlord already, if not to the specific class itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gradine, post: 7055210, member: 57112"] So, my personal thinking is that the Order of the Avatar Mystic makes the need for Warlord much lower, rather than much greater, which takes me back to my original point waaaay up-thread that I'd rather, again personally, that if WotC is going spend their resources on creating 5e versions of older classes, that they spend those resources on classes that present new mechanics within 5e, rather than mechanics that already exist but with a slightly different coat of paint slapped on. I don't even think the case can be made anymore that the original mechanics of the Warlord exist in 5e but could stand to be expanded on (which is the argument I'd make in requesting, say a real 5e Spellthief or possibly even an Archivist, which I think could be handled as a Wizard archetype); the Order of the Avatar's mantles certainly take care on that front. There are 5e martial characters that have resource management, so "if it's martial it has to be at-will" argument simply holds no water. The best argument for a dedicated 5e Warlord class, at this point, are anti-magic fields. Which amounts to requesting that martial characters be even more versatile and powerful in a rare corner case of the game where every other type of character is effectively already neutered (which is why anti-magic fields are an awful game mechanic 99% of the time and best used extremely sparingly for best effect and therefore are really not worth designing an entire class of character around). Again, I am not anti-Warlord by any stretch (my longest-played 4e character was a Warlord); but I had few problems converting that character to 5e before Order of the Avatar and definitely have no problems doing so now. I wouldn't be upset to seeing a new, fully formed Warlord class show up anytime, but I'd be disappointed that my admittedly more niche pre-5e, more mechanically unique classes weren't getting more love first. Because 5e is has already given so much love to the mechanical underpinnings of the Warlord already, if not to the specific class itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What the warlord needs in 5e and how to make it happen.
Top