Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What would it take?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="s/LaSH" data-source="post: 1795759" data-attributes="member: 6929"><p>Why not? Maybe our hypothetical scriptwriter can be as good as Whedon, but would never have discovered if he/she didn't try. If we say 'don't try', we are purposefully dumbing down the product - and I don't think we need to do that.</p><p></p><p>And a large cast could easily play into worldbuilding, actually. Take them from different ethnic, social, professional backgrounds, and occasionally throw them back. Give them links to huge portions of the world, and phrases like 'my hometown is in peril' become harder and harder to <em>avoid</em>, thus giving our 'face' characters reason to care about the world, thus giving the viewing audience a link to something that's quite distant from most. Also, giving the cast provincial traits gives you world building and character development in the same bucket. It's efficiant!</p><p></p><p>Now, on the topic of 'flavour': the suggestions of 'low weird monster count' and 'flowery Olde Englishe' and 'morals' just clicked into place in my head. They say 'Camelot with a D&D ruleset' to me. Now, that's fine. But I think it's not making the most of D&D, which is all about the weird monsters and the cool spells and, increasingly these days, realistic world-building with D&D rules (like Eberron, which is closer to vanilla, straight-out-of-the-books D&D than Camelot is). Note that I'm not arguing against morals. One of D&D's great strengths in this regard is the alignment system, which is slightly recognised in-game, and thus allows people to actively talk about morals.</p><p></p><p>I realise that I'm stepping on uncertain ground here, as D&D covers so many bases and means different things to different people. But I think a D&D TV show should portray the product with as little filter as possible, and that means picking up the rulebook and using it, rather than the ideas other people have developed off it. I'm not really familiar with Eberron, so I can't say whether it's suitable or not. If it isn't, some quick worldbuilding before the show starts would be advisable, just so everything makes sense.</p><p></p><p>Do you see what I'm saying?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="s/LaSH, post: 1795759, member: 6929"] Why not? Maybe our hypothetical scriptwriter can be as good as Whedon, but would never have discovered if he/she didn't try. If we say 'don't try', we are purposefully dumbing down the product - and I don't think we need to do that. And a large cast could easily play into worldbuilding, actually. Take them from different ethnic, social, professional backgrounds, and occasionally throw them back. Give them links to huge portions of the world, and phrases like 'my hometown is in peril' become harder and harder to [i]avoid[/i], thus giving our 'face' characters reason to care about the world, thus giving the viewing audience a link to something that's quite distant from most. Also, giving the cast provincial traits gives you world building and character development in the same bucket. It's efficiant! Now, on the topic of 'flavour': the suggestions of 'low weird monster count' and 'flowery Olde Englishe' and 'morals' just clicked into place in my head. They say 'Camelot with a D&D ruleset' to me. Now, that's fine. But I think it's not making the most of D&D, which is all about the weird monsters and the cool spells and, increasingly these days, realistic world-building with D&D rules (like Eberron, which is closer to vanilla, straight-out-of-the-books D&D than Camelot is). Note that I'm not arguing against morals. One of D&D's great strengths in this regard is the alignment system, which is slightly recognised in-game, and thus allows people to actively talk about morals. I realise that I'm stepping on uncertain ground here, as D&D covers so many bases and means different things to different people. But I think a D&D TV show should portray the product with as little filter as possible, and that means picking up the rulebook and using it, rather than the ideas other people have developed off it. I'm not really familiar with Eberron, so I can't say whether it's suitable or not. If it isn't, some quick worldbuilding before the show starts would be advisable, just so everything makes sense. Do you see what I'm saying? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What would it take?
Top