Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dave2008" data-source="post: 7831823" data-attributes="member: 83242">It is interesting, but I am not convinced it is better yet (still looking for a PF2e game).&nbsp; If I were to go to the effort to bring it to 5e I would make it a 6 action system and include reactions with it. That way you can control counterspell spam, and OAs (similar to how PF2e already does, but it is built into the action economy)With 6 actions you have (off the top of my head):Move = 1 action = 10 feetDisengage = 2 actions = 10 feetAttack = 2 actions (not sure if we should add the penalties from PF2e, maybe when fighters get extra attack you just reduce the penalty, makes them the best fighters)Cast a spell = variable actions, most cost 4 actions (perhaps 2 actions per spell component or 1 +1 per spell level if you want to nerf casting a bit)Reaction = 1 or 2 actionsBonus action = 1 actionEDIT:&nbsp; this lines up nicely with a 6 second round too.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dave2008, post: 7831823, member: 83242"] It is interesting, but I am not convinced it is better yet (still looking for a PF2e game). If I were to go to the effort to bring it to 5e I would make it a [B]6 action[/B] system and include reactions with it. That way you can control counterspell spam, and OAs (similar to how PF2e already does, but it is built into the action economy) [U]With 6 actions you have (off the top of my head):[/U] Move = 1 action = 10 feet Disengage = 2 actions = 10 feet Attack = 2 actions (not sure if we should add the penalties from PF2e, maybe when fighters get extra attack you just reduce the penalty, makes them the best fighters) Cast a spell = variable actions, most cost 4 actions (perhaps 2 actions per spell component or 1 +1 per spell level if you want to nerf casting a bit) Reaction = 1 or 2 actions Bonus action = 1 action EDIT: this lines up nicely with a 6 second round too. [/QUOTE]

Verification