Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's the deal with 3rd party PF2E Adventure "support"??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="teitan" data-source="post: 8234809" data-attributes="member: 3457"><p>I don't think 3pp is important like it was 5-15 or more years ago, especially for Paizo, who has built a strong brand name for quality products. 3pp doesn't really drive core sales like it used to with just about every 3pp publisher now developing house systems and those of D&D inclination adopting some form of the OSR movement as their core system. While Paizo supports 3pp because of the OGL primarily, they don't need 3pp. Back in the day 3pp really drove the industy. I managed a game/comic shop and once the D20 bubble burst and we started getting more quality product 3pp for D&D it really kept the industry going when White Wolf crapped the bed and ended the original WOD and Chaosium started having funding issues as well as undelivered product (Pulp Cthulhu I am looking at you). The market was still nowhere near the size it is now and what I can see is that that market is basically 5e with very little lifting of other publishers. Paizo is banking on what is now essentially a house system, almost divorced from D&D, especially with WOTC now slowly dropping or changing D&Disms like Alignments and adopting the Tasha's rules as standard.</p><p></p><p>What Paizo struggled with, and struggles with, is the identification of Pathfinder with D&D. I have been invited to play D&D in groups, they say D&D but it's Pathfinder. They are considered synonymous. With 5e being such a massive and the publishers like Kobold and such having very close relationships with WOTC, its kind of hurt them in that 3pp field because Pathfinder no longer resembles 3.5 era D&D, nor is it 5e era D&D. So the two massive audiences are no longer there for Paizo in that regard. They are banking on Pathfinder/Golarion fans. They are building their own brand identity beyond "unofficial heir" to 3.5. 3pp would help but like other games, it's not necessary and compared to other companies, they are also doing very well.</p><p></p><p>I think we, as a community, have placed a lot of emphasis on 3pp support as an indicator of success but we seem to only apply it to D&D and Pathfinder. We overanalyze it but barely breathe of the idea for Cthulhu or any number of other games out there. Other OGL based games failed even with decent support like Mongoose Runequest. Maybe it's time we quit looking at 3pp support for anything not called D&D?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="teitan, post: 8234809, member: 3457"] I don't think 3pp is important like it was 5-15 or more years ago, especially for Paizo, who has built a strong brand name for quality products. 3pp doesn't really drive core sales like it used to with just about every 3pp publisher now developing house systems and those of D&D inclination adopting some form of the OSR movement as their core system. While Paizo supports 3pp because of the OGL primarily, they don't need 3pp. Back in the day 3pp really drove the industy. I managed a game/comic shop and once the D20 bubble burst and we started getting more quality product 3pp for D&D it really kept the industry going when White Wolf crapped the bed and ended the original WOD and Chaosium started having funding issues as well as undelivered product (Pulp Cthulhu I am looking at you). The market was still nowhere near the size it is now and what I can see is that that market is basically 5e with very little lifting of other publishers. Paizo is banking on what is now essentially a house system, almost divorced from D&D, especially with WOTC now slowly dropping or changing D&Disms like Alignments and adopting the Tasha's rules as standard. What Paizo struggled with, and struggles with, is the identification of Pathfinder with D&D. I have been invited to play D&D in groups, they say D&D but it's Pathfinder. They are considered synonymous. With 5e being such a massive and the publishers like Kobold and such having very close relationships with WOTC, its kind of hurt them in that 3pp field because Pathfinder no longer resembles 3.5 era D&D, nor is it 5e era D&D. So the two massive audiences are no longer there for Paizo in that regard. They are banking on Pathfinder/Golarion fans. They are building their own brand identity beyond "unofficial heir" to 3.5. 3pp would help but like other games, it's not necessary and compared to other companies, they are also doing very well. I think we, as a community, have placed a lot of emphasis on 3pp support as an indicator of success but we seem to only apply it to D&D and Pathfinder. We overanalyze it but barely breathe of the idea for Cthulhu or any number of other games out there. Other OGL based games failed even with decent support like Mongoose Runequest. Maybe it's time we quit looking at 3pp support for anything not called D&D? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's the deal with 3rd party PF2E Adventure "support"??
Top