Warrior Poet
Explorer
Prost!
kenobi65 said:Sounds like the issue (and most of the job cuts, based on the article Reveal linked to) has everything to do with your employer anticipating that that particular division was going to continue to decrease in importance (and profitability).
Just because the company as a whole is making great money doesn't mean every division is.
I think the other issue they face is that they're clearly spending far too much money on having Catherine Zeta-Jones as their spokeswoman here in the U.S.![]()
![]()
To provide a brief summary: reducing costs = increased share price.Dougal DeKree said:Exactly after making this success public there goes the second announcement: Next year they want to reduce the staff by 32000 people.
IMO our managers must by CE or simply nuts. Or can anyone tell me the logic behind this?
nothing to see here said:Whether ruthless behaviour is more systemic to the corporation than to the individual is purely dependant on your politics or, perhaps, your personal experience.
Dougal DeKree said:Kid, give me an offer and I am off.