Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's wrong with this psion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eric V" data-source="post: 8096362" data-attributes="member: 6779717"><p>So, here's the thing: People who have no intention of ever using psionics are voting on the psion. I mean, people -could- recuse themselves and leave only psion fans to vote (and just not bother with the material when it comes out), but...that doesn't seem to be the case. When you write "no one wanted it" that's simply not true. Lots of people liked the Mystic, but lots also didn't like it because a) "No new classes!!" b) "I hate psionics" c) "Why is it using a different system from spells?" and d) Constructive criticism</p><p></p><p>NOTHING will satisfy people who answered based on a) and b) and psion fans from previous editions have trouble with c) (Because it's always been non-spells).</p><p></p><p>The masses, in general, are very conservative in things like this, and so for something that is non-core like psionics, but still has a rich tradition in the game, it will never see light of day with the masses (many who were never going to use psionics in the first place) blocking attempts.</p><p></p><p>More generally, the conservative nature of the masses snips creativity/complexity in other classes as well; just compare playtest packets to what we got in the end. For a creative enterprise like an RPG, I hate that the generally conservative masses gatekeep the most interesting ideas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eric V, post: 8096362, member: 6779717"] So, here's the thing: People who have no intention of ever using psionics are voting on the psion. I mean, people -could- recuse themselves and leave only psion fans to vote (and just not bother with the material when it comes out), but...that doesn't seem to be the case. When you write "no one wanted it" that's simply not true. Lots of people liked the Mystic, but lots also didn't like it because a) "No new classes!!" b) "I hate psionics" c) "Why is it using a different system from spells?" and d) Constructive criticism NOTHING will satisfy people who answered based on a) and b) and psion fans from previous editions have trouble with c) (Because it's always been non-spells). The masses, in general, are very conservative in things like this, and so for something that is non-core like psionics, but still has a rich tradition in the game, it will never see light of day with the masses (many who were never going to use psionics in the first place) blocking attempts. More generally, the conservative nature of the masses snips creativity/complexity in other classes as well; just compare playtest packets to what we got in the end. For a creative enterprise like an RPG, I hate that the generally conservative masses gatekeep the most interesting ideas. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's wrong with this psion?
Top