Recidivism
First Post
None, because I don't see the need to classify myself based on some contrived system made for a game.
What's your alignment in real life?
- Thread starter DreadArchon
- Start date
Relique du Madde
Adventurer
I transend the concept of alignment due to the fact that I'm a digital entity, and thus I only exist in two states either "on" or "off" (although in a quantum sense I exist in both an on state and an off state simultaniously). The definition of what constitutes and "on" or an "off" state is to be defined by the observer.
However, usually when I am forced to take an alignment test I end up as a random chaotic alignment or neutral evil. So go figure.
However, usually when I am forced to take an alignment test I end up as a random chaotic alignment or neutral evil. So go figure.
Last edited:
Lancelot
Adventurer
Probably Lawful Evil.
I promote the idea of an orderly, structured society. I dislike the concept of chaos and anarchy. I'll side with the Empire over the Rebel Alliance any day. Whenever I hear that there was a violent event involving the police, I'm predisposed to think that the police were using necessary force to quell criminal elements (until convinced otherwise).
I'm self-interested. Although I do things for other people, I'm ultimately motivated by what it does for me. For example, I frequently do something that could be viewed as generous or kindly (donating time or money to help someone), but I'm primarily motivated to do so for recognition or to improve that person's view of me. If it was a purely anonymous donation, I'd be far less inclined to do so.
On the other hand, I also don't go out of my way to inflict suffering on others. Live and let live, and all that. So, possibly Lawful Neutral.
I promote the idea of an orderly, structured society. I dislike the concept of chaos and anarchy. I'll side with the Empire over the Rebel Alliance any day. Whenever I hear that there was a violent event involving the police, I'm predisposed to think that the police were using necessary force to quell criminal elements (until convinced otherwise).
I'm self-interested. Although I do things for other people, I'm ultimately motivated by what it does for me. For example, I frequently do something that could be viewed as generous or kindly (donating time or money to help someone), but I'm primarily motivated to do so for recognition or to improve that person's view of me. If it was a purely anonymous donation, I'd be far less inclined to do so.
On the other hand, I also don't go out of my way to inflict suffering on others. Live and let live, and all that. So, possibly Lawful Neutral.
Mr. Wilson
Explorer
I voted LN, then tried to stop my vote, and vote TN. I like order and structure in normal everyday life (law), but generally distrust most governmental authorities (go figure, I work in a gov't job) and downright hate most major companies (chaos). I don't go out of my way to help people (good), nor do I go out of my way to harm others (evil).
It's funny, when I was a senior in high school, I was most definetly CG. By the time I was a senior in college, I was LN, and now, three years later, I'm TN. I'm way to cynical to ever be "good" again.
It's funny, when I was a senior in high school, I was most definetly CG. By the time I was a senior in college, I was LN, and now, three years later, I'm TN. I'm way to cynical to ever be "good" again.
Last edited:
This in a nutshell is why I am Chaotic and oppose government in any form.Korgoth said:
To me, whether the violence is "lawful" or not is irrelevant- that it exists at all is abhorrent, and intolerable. I suppose part of the Chaos in my nature is that I am, myself, willing to do violence to others who attempt to force such things upon me. Paradox is chaotic, in most peoples' view, is it not?And hey, that last sentence acquires a double meaning with my screen name.
HalWhitewyrm
First Post
Neutral Good, I think. I aspire to Lawful Good, but I know I'm certainly not there yet.
Similar Threads
