IMO males cannot maintain a female persona consistently, and the same hold true for females playing men.
Since then the rest have us have had a blast. More so than before and I think every player will attest to that. We all like this game and we don't want anything screwing it up. So yes, in essence we have had a bad experience with this issue and as far as this campaign goes, we would not liek to go down this road again. Maybe in future campaigns, but I doubt it. That's just the way we are. Feel free to flame us all. It's easy to do on the internet.
What I find funny is that some of us are quick to say how wrong it is to not allow cross gender playing
but then go and post how munchkin the hulking hurler or a PC with 15 prestige classes is and no DM in their right mind should let it in their game.
It's your game and if you are having fun, you are doing something right no matter what someone on the internet tries to tell you
Yeah, but which halves?die_kluge said:Secondly, I tallied up all the characters I'd ever played once upon a time. Fully 50% of them were female. Yes, HALF.
Crothian said:First off you are not the only one. In my expereince males who play females either end up:
1) Playing the character no different from any other so asside from the female gender on the character sheet one would never know
2) Go overboard with female only problems/or what to be a rape survivor or something like that that it just takes the game completely out of whack
3) Play a comic steroetype that is just insulting
4) Do an okay job with it
And it is less then 25% that actually do a good job with it, though most play it like number one and you'd have no idea what the gender is. So, I'll discourage it just like I discourage from women playing males unless they have a really good compelling reason to do so. But frankly, I haven't ran into this problem in many years.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.