Christoph the Magus
Explorer
I started in the summer of 1991, with the dragonlance trilogy. Took a huge break in college since the local bible-thumpers would tear down signs advertising for a group and it was hard to find any local gamers.
tenkar said:Gary,
I happily stand corrected
I am amazed at how long D&D has been a part of my life... I owe you a drink and much more
Erik
Nalfeshnee said:I like the shape that graph is taking - it shows a lot about D&D history![]()
What it likely indicates is that WotC is not expending much in the way of resources to attract new players. Perhaps they are hoping that by making 4E more akin to an online game such as World of Warcraft will alone attract new players.Christoph the Magus said:I actually don't like the shape that the graph has taken, since it shows that the game isn't drawing in new players.
Not quite true; it shows *ENWorld* isn't drawing in new players.Christoph the Magus said:I actually don't like the shape that the graph has taken, since it shows that the game isn't drawing in new players.
That assumption is possible, although the size and diversity of the membership here rather points to a fair random sampling of D&D game players. Thus there might be merit to the observation that there are fewer new players than is indicative of a stable, let alone growing audience base.Lanefan said:Not quite true; it shows *ENWorld* isn't drawing in new players.
Lanefan
Col_Pladoh said:Cheers,
Gary (with apologies for pirating this thread, and I will now shut up)
Ilium said:But today be the day for such shenanigans! Pirate away, me hearty! Arrr!!
I think I have a good guess. Second generation gamers. People that started playing in high school or college in the seventies and eighties might have kids that, around the early 90s, would be old enough to learn.Lanefan said:.
- what's with the spike in 1992, though? That's not the 2e spike (that would have been about 1988-89 but there only a small spike there)...so what happened in 1992 to draw so many new players in? Yes, it could be a statistical aberration, but...