Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6577803" data-attributes="member: 2525">Criticism of your comments is not the same as acting as the thought police.&nbsp; You dish out a heaping ton of criticism every week, and your complaint that even a small dose of it back equates with the thought police seems very shallow and vapid.&nbsp; No, he did not.&nbsp; Why are you immediately going back to the very issue we just discussed? Seriously Goldomark, what would compel you to do the very sort of thing we JUST finished with? Again, he said, &quot;We're looking at two storylines a year.&quot;&nbsp; Not &quot;You should expect two APs a year,&quot; but &quot;[WOTC] is looking at two storylines a year&quot;.&nbsp; There is no assumption there that readers should therefore create an expectation that what WOTC is looking at is something they should expect will happen.&nbsp; Much like, as I said before, if I tell you a couple months in advance that I am looking to arrive at a party at 8, that does not mean you should EXPECT me to arrive at 8, when months later the party happens.&nbsp; Looking at something is not the same as creating a reasonable expectation of a commitment to that thing.I do identify with &quot;people&quot; (and thanks for that snotty comment by the way), but you're speaking for yourself and nobody else.&nbsp; So why would you claim anyone else is behaving the way you are behaving concerning this issue? It's you Goldomark - not &quot;people&quot; but &quot;Goldomark&quot;.&nbsp; Unless you want to name these other people you're speaking for, you represent just you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6577803, member: 2525"] Criticism of your comments is not the same as acting as the thought police. You dish out a heaping ton of criticism every week, and your complaint that even a small dose of it back equates with the thought police seems very shallow and vapid. No, he did not. Why are you immediately going back to the very issue we just discussed? Seriously Goldomark, what would compel you to do the very sort of thing we JUST finished with? Again, he said, "We're looking at two storylines a year." Not "You should expect two APs a year," but "[WOTC] is looking at two storylines a year". There is no assumption there that readers should therefore create an expectation that what WOTC is looking at is something they should expect will happen. Much like, as I said before, if I tell you a couple months in advance that I am looking to arrive at a party at 8, that does not mean you should EXPECT me to arrive at 8, when months later the party happens. Looking at something is not the same as creating a reasonable expectation of a commitment to that thing. I do identify with "people" (and thanks for that snotty comment by the way), but you're speaking for yourself and nobody else. So why would you claim anyone else is behaving the way you are behaving concerning this issue? It's you Goldomark - not "people" but "Goldomark". Unless you want to name these other people you're speaking for, you represent just you. [/QUOTE]

Verification