no I don't... TBH I think that this has gone way too far into the tribalism of edition wars, social skills, if a player can ask for a skill, if a player can add to a game world, if a DM is a type of player or above the players, and I am sure I am forgetting a dozen other arguments enworld is now famus for that basicly turn into unhelpful arguments were both sides are trying to score points...Does anyone actually think anyone being this combative, not to mention derogatory, to the opposite side will contribute a single iota of productivity to this thread? The poll is a personal preference question, and not something with any sort of objective answer.
but I feel insulted, I am sure at least 1 poster feels I have BEEN insulting, and as you say we have all not argued against each other so long that we are all dug in... that is the way it works...
Even when I take 48 hours away I come back to dozens of tags on posts like this. So if I left today for a vacation I would just come back to being in the same place I am not (feeling attacked and persecuted and like i need to defend myself) and the other side of the argument I am 100% sure feels the same (at least most are in good faith sure there may be a troll or two on each side)
but we broke ALL the rules long ago... we use insults we make thigns personal we put words in peoples mouths and I don't know how to stop the cycle...
TBH the point was lost days ago. But like I keep saying I post on here 10 positive things I love about gaming and lore and get 1 or 2 responses... I post in this argument and have 3 tags before I hit post.The hyperbole, the insults, the putting words in peoples' mouths, the refusal to look at posts in good faith and with the benefit of the doubt, is it worth it? What's the point?
edit: when I typed this 2 people had already responded to other things and tagged me not 3 just to keep the record straight... still nothing on death dragons, soth, disintigration swords, funny stories though