Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crothian" data-source="post: 4522539" data-attributes="member: 232">1. Psionics:   Not a fan, works too much like the normal spell systems2. Tome of Battle: Again, not a fan.  It felt once again too much like just magic.  3. Fighter Sux: Over 9 years of playing and running 3ed and we always had a fighter and he was always effective.  4. Wizard and CoDzilla overpowered to the point of game disruption: Overpowered, I'd say yes.  To the point of game disruption though, never.  But nothing rules wise ever disrupted out games.  5. Your 3E games: Rules as written or houseruled into oblivion? In the middle, we have a few house rules that all apply to PCs and to each PC equally.  6. Does your group optimize, or play more casually? Yes!!  We have both, but I will say those who optimize usually aren't that good at it.  7. Eberron: Eberron is a great setting.  I was not a fan initially but the books converted me once I gave them a chance.  8. Do you currently play more 3E, or 4E?Changeling<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool    :cool:"  data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" />3e because there is a campaign that needs to be finished.  4e is too new so I wanted to wait a little before we started it.</blockquote>