Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John Cooper" data-source="post: 4522564" data-attributes="member: 24255">1.&nbsp; I generally dislike psionics; if I must deal with them, I use the &quot;psionics = magic&quot; option.2.&nbsp; I dislike Tome of Battle, and we do not use it in our campaign.3.&nbsp; We've never had a problem with fighters, although I don't think we've ever had a really high-level fighter.4.&nbsp; Likewise, I've never seen wizards/clerics/druids getting too out of hand, to the point of game disruption.5.&nbsp; We have very few house rules.6.&nbsp; Our group tends to be more casual, rather than try to optimize each character build.7.&nbsp; I've really enjoyed reading Eberron, and hope to have the time to run a campaign there eventually.&nbsp; It's a great setting.8.&nbsp; We play 3.5 exclusively, and have never tried 4E.&nbsp; (Nor are we likely to, as we're having a good time with 3.5 and have plenty of material to keep us busy for years.)&nbsp; I'm the full-time DM.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="John Cooper, post: 4522564, member: 24255"] 1. I generally dislike psionics; if I must deal with them, I use the "psionics = magic" option. 2. I dislike [i]Tome of Battle[/i], and we do not use it in our campaign. 3. We've never had a problem with fighters, although I don't think we've ever had a really high-level fighter. 4. Likewise, I've never seen wizards/clerics/druids getting too out of hand, to the point of game disruption. 5. We have very few house rules. 6. Our group tends to be more casual, rather than try to optimize each character build. 7. I've really enjoyed reading Eberron, and hope to have the time to run a campaign there eventually. It's a great setting. 8. We play 3.5 exclusively, and have never tried 4E. (Nor are we likely to, as we're having a good time with 3.5 and have plenty of material to keep us busy for years.) I'm the full-time DM. [/QUOTE]

Verification