Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Angrydad" data-source="post: 4522595" data-attributes="member: 70987">1. Psionics: Good or Bad?     They have their place, but in a nonpsionic setting they quickly become problematic.2. Tome of Battle: The antichrist or best thing that ever happened?Initially seemed too powerful (swordsage getting 6x6 skill points is still stupid) but is just not really my cup of tea. 3. Fighter Sux: Yes or No?No. Fighters who get a good selection of feats and then do some creative tactics kick arse.4. Wizard and CoDzilla overpowered to the point of game disruption: yes or no?They're only overpowered for the duration of the spells they're using, and if you play a multi-encounter per day sort of campaign, having a spellcaster try and use these combos the whole time basically means they miss out on some other really sweet options. So no.5. Your 3E games: Rules as written or houseruled into oblivion?A few house rules, but basically still the same as 3.5 RAW.6. Does your group optimize, or play more casually?Sometimes a player will optimize the hell out of his/her character (Radiant Servant of Pelor, anyone?) but mostly it's all about fun.7. Eberron: Yes or No?Yes to many of the ideas, Action Point system, Warforged, Changelings, etc. but not really to the setting.8. Do you currently play more 3E, or 4E?(this question is to see where each group falls in terms of the previous questions)It's all about 3.5, baby! Not going to ever DM 4e.</blockquote>