Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imban" data-source="post: 4522603" data-attributes="member: 29206">Awesome. My games always feature both psionic PCs and psionic foes.One of the best things that ever happened. Introduced plenty of neat moves for fighter-types.3e's Fighter class is the worst incarnation of Fighter in D&D ever, seriously. It's still useful for dips for feats, or for things like Dungeoncrasher, but eww.No. Though, since I play gestalt, almost everyone in my groups ends up being a wizard, cleric, or psion of SOME stripe. (Druids aren't so popular because I pretty much ban shapeshifting and polymorphing due to how WotC couldn't write understandable rules for them, much less working ones.)A combination of both. It's not "houseruled into oblivion" in the sense of "I play E6" or "I play Grim'n'Gritty" or otherwise tore up 90% of the engine, but I do play gestalt and do ban or alter the effects of a wide range of things that make the game less fun.Optimization, hell yeahEberron's really cool, but I've never really gotten into it - D&D isn't really much about the published settings for me, and the only reason I like the Forgotten Realms is because of the CRPGs.All 3e all the time, no 4e any of the time</blockquote>