Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 4524721" data-attributes="member: 54877">1. Psionics:  Always been indifferent to psionics.  Don't really think about them enough to dislike them, but they never seem to grab me (in any system).  2. Tome of Battle: Was not buying 3.5 books. Only bought the Magic Item Compedium, which I thought was merely decent (though I like the execution of the same idea better in 4E than in 3.5).  3. Fighter Sux: Pure fighter was never a players' first choice in our campaigns, but fighter/rogue (mostly fighter) saw good play.  After we got going with Arcana Evolved, the unfettered and warmain pretty much exile the fighter from the table.  4. Wizard and CoDzilla overpowered to the point of game disruption:  A little overpowered, but not usually a problem.  Only time it was a problem was in a gestalt game, which can hardly be blamed on the core system. 5. Your 3E games: Rules as written or houseruled into oblivion? Played it both ways.  House rules were more for campaign flavor than balance, though. 6. Does your group optimize, or play more casually? Mostly casual. Even the optimizers are sensitive enough to not overshadow the others.   7. Eberron: Nothing against Eberron, but I wasn't looking for a setting when it arrived, and thus never gave it much of a chance.  Some of the surface stuff doesn't appeal to me, either, but I wouldn't let that stop me if I were interested in it otherwise. 8. Do you currently play more 3E, or 4E? 4E, though still think 3E (well, AE) is a fun game.</blockquote>

Verification