Which is better?

its ok trainz...you can send me that little ole file and i will take a look at it....

but i will not print it ...............not with a canon anyway, i have an epson
 

log in or register to remove this ad

LGodamus said:
its ok trainz...you can send me that little ole file and i will take a look at it....

but i will not print it ...............not with a canon anyway, i have an epson
LOL... I have an Epson too, but the Epson logo blows, so I decided to use Canon's for my little diatribe.

My diatribe WAS in jest, of course. I keed, because I love.

You can now become the proud owner of trainz's *FREE* Dungeons & Dragons Third Edition Point Five Dungeon Master's Deluxe Screen by clicking here.



You will be billed in 36 easy installments of $ 19.95. You have 10 working days to return the above mentioned merchandise if you are not satisfied with it, or if it has been damaged or otherwise altered by shipping & handling. Past that period, you will be required to submit to those payments. Failure to do so will grant Trainz and co © to seize all available goods in the residence of the customer of a minimum retail value of $600.00 US. No prior notice will be delivered, and the customer forgoes any prosecution rights against Trainz and co ©. Thank you for your interest in our product.
 


Looks pretty decent Trainz, any chance you could post an editable version? I'd love to add a little colour when I print it out on MY epson. :)
 



SlamZanee said:
of those two though which looks better...so many suggestions but none actually awnser the topic lol.... :)
Um, I DID answer your question. One screen is for 3.0, one is for 3.5. go with whichever edition of the game you are playing. Just like I said in my first post. :cool:

They are both good screens, but the 3.5 is probably the better, but if you are playing 3.0 some of the charts on it are going to be useless to you.
 




Remove ads

Top