Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which of these should be core classes for D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 9157053" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>If the limitations of the oath make sense to the player, sure. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p><p></p><p>Though having one class that works that way amongst a dozen classes that don’t is bad design IMO. </p><p></p><p>And happily, the Paladin doesn’t work that way. Easy as that! <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😄" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f604.png" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes :smile:" data-shortname=":smile:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p><p></p><p>“Armed combat specialist” is a class concept!? </p><p></p><p>How? What is the actual concept? How is it distinct from any other weapon using class? Thematically, the fighter is a class group, at best. It’s the kernel of a concept that is shared by…most classes. </p><p></p><p>Now, boosting the “epic mundane” stuff like has been discussed so much lately gives the class more identity IMO, but it’s still a class that gets by far most of its flavor from the subclass, but most of its power from the fairly flavorless base class features. </p><p></p><p>So if I were on a team restructuring classes, I’d split fighter up before I’d put any existing class inside the fighter’s umbrella. Give Ranger and Barbarian Second Wind, give Rogue and Monk Action Surge, make additional extra attacks a level 10+ feat that requires Extra Attack, give Indomitable to Paladin, and off the top of my head I can’t think anything else unique to the fighter base class. </p><p></p><p>That, or make those core features work like expertise and be available to several classes not just one or two, and split the mundane fighter into <strong>Knight</strong>, <strong>Duelist</strong>, and <strong>Archer</strong>, put brute type subclasses in Barbarian, share space between the fighter classes and the Monk who is acts a lot like a <strong>mystical, but not necessarily magical as such, warrior</strong>, and make limited forms of those core “warrior” abilities available as feats.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 9157053, member: 6704184"] If the limitations of the oath make sense to the player, sure. 🤷♂️ Though having one class that works that way amongst a dozen classes that don’t is bad design IMO. And happily, the Paladin doesn’t work that way. Easy as that! 😄 “Armed combat specialist” is a class concept!? How? What is the actual concept? How is it distinct from any other weapon using class? Thematically, the fighter is a class group, at best. It’s the kernel of a concept that is shared by…most classes. Now, boosting the “epic mundane” stuff like has been discussed so much lately gives the class more identity IMO, but it’s still a class that gets by far most of its flavor from the subclass, but most of its power from the fairly flavorless base class features. So if I were on a team restructuring classes, I’d split fighter up before I’d put any existing class inside the fighter’s umbrella. Give Ranger and Barbarian Second Wind, give Rogue and Monk Action Surge, make additional extra attacks a level 10+ feat that requires Extra Attack, give Indomitable to Paladin, and off the top of my head I can’t think anything else unique to the fighter base class. That, or make those core features work like expertise and be available to several classes not just one or two, and split the mundane fighter into [B]Knight[/B], [B]Duelist[/B], and [B]Archer[/B], put brute type subclasses in Barbarian, share space between the fighter classes and the Monk who is acts a lot like a [B]mystical, but not necessarily magical as such, warrior[/B], and make limited forms of those core “warrior” abilities available as feats. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which of these should be core classes for D&D?
Top